Sean Playfair

Check Sean's work out if you haven't already, folks.

http://www.abctales.com/user/sean-playfair

'Hairs' and 'White Soul Star'. I don't really have what's needed to give a proper critical analysis. I just think these are two excellent and accomplished poems by someone I'll keep looking out for.

Liana07 | February 12, 2007 - 18:07

I do like hairs, very much. Hurrah!

Sean Playfair | February 12, 2007 - 19:27

Thank you both so much, what a nice welcome and initial response. I'll be sure to get involved in some flagging, reaction and critique too as soon as I feel comfortable...

alan_benefit | February 12, 2007 - 19:47

Both 'cherried' as well, Sean. Deservedly so.

josiedog | February 12, 2007 - 20:25

Ventured into the realm of poetry because of all this fuss.

Hairs is blinding.
Can't say any more than that.
Think I might read "white Soul Star" now...

ivoryfishbone | February 13, 2007 - 00:29

very delighted to come across these poems ... makes the wizened editorial heart go pit a pat ...

hairs in particular gave me the tweaks ...

span | February 13, 2007 - 01:56

I am going to be totally inarticulate and just say Hairs is awesome.
So precise and flamboyant at the same time.

Span

poetjude | February 13, 2007 - 09:40

Hairs is very good. Perfect pace, exciting - didn't want it to be finished when I'd finished reading it even though it was absolutely complete. I don't like poetry that uses startling imagery so quirky it shouts 'look at me, I'm different!' when it is, like a teenager experimenting with green hair dye, not different at all. This on the other hand is clever, sophisticated and paradoxically, its brilliant toolbox of metaphors and imagery and wordplay is so subtle, its glaring.

Nice one!

jude

"Cacoethes scribendi"
http://www.judesworld.net

josiedog | February 13, 2007 - 10:02

I wanted to say "awesome" but I bottled out at the last minute..

It is though...

Sean Playfair | February 13, 2007 - 15:26

Well, I'm certainly happy with that feedback. Thank you all loads again. I'm not exactly prolific at the moment -- they're about my only two poems in the last year! But I feel encouraged to churn out more now, the way I used to.

All I need are some ideas to swim around in my head and bug me till I spill them onto my computer.

Oh yeah, I forgot I needed those.

ivoryfishbone | February 13, 2007 - 16:13

i don't suppose you realise this but it is very unusual to get this sort of feedback on here sean ...

get writing!

ivoryfishbone | February 15, 2007 - 22:38

i am sending the link for hairs to my aussie who is in south korea and has been missing his dog for 9 months ...

maz373 | February 15, 2007 - 22:52

i like hairs! you're a good writer dude

Sean Playfair | February 16, 2007 - 12:47

Thanks. ivoryfishbone, have you missed a word after "aussie", or is he/she simply YOUR aussie? I suppose everyone should have one!

Anyway, hope he/she is cheered up. I should be posting another poem today, if I get round to finishing it.

ivoryfishbone | February 16, 2007 - 18:04

no word missing ... he is just my aussie ... not sure everyone should have one ... he is rather difficult at times ...

Juliet OC | February 16, 2007 - 19:11

I enjoyed both, though i prefer White Soul Star. I am not a writer of poetry and i find some poems too obscure to grasp. Both these poems whilst original and fresh don't leave me scratching my head at the end.

Possibly contempary poetry has got to clever for its own good, so only poets can appreciate it. From the amount of interest in your work, it appears you have achieved both excellent poetry but kept it accessible.

I look forward to more.

Juliet

p.s. my comment about contempary poetry is not a dig at any poets on here. Though i am up for a response if anyone feels i am talking out of my bottom.

Jack Cade | February 17, 2007 - 12:33

'Hairs' is good. There are things that stick out for me as being lapses though.

"c:\my docs\my life\my soul\my pics\my gallery" is a cool idea for a line, but I'm not sure why we have 'my pics' followed by 'my gallery' - same sorta thing, surely? And I want something more inventive than 'my soul' as well - we've already had 'my life', which seems to be roughly the same thing - your essence, or being.

"like scousers they get everywhere" is a totally redundant simile ("they get everywhere" says as much, since there's no particular 'style' of getting everywhere, or associated set of ideas, that 'scousers' suggests, as far as I can see). It falls especially flat if, like me, you can't remember the last time your encountered a scouser anywhere.

"a/coconut shell, backing gingerly as a juggernaught " - both decent comparison points, but I think they corrupt one another by being in such close proximity. Am I thinking of a coconut or a juggernaut now? Or a juggernaught-shaped coconut backing up? Similar situation with 'sewer breath' and 'hairdryer on my neck' - the density of images makes it difficult to dwell on the significance of one of the other.

'raver' and 'rave' are very close together, and I'm not getting any particular effect from the repetition. Not sure why it's there, which makes it seem accidental ie. careless.

Sean Playfair | February 17, 2007 - 19:18

Thanks for your comments, Jack.

I see your point about repetition of ideas in line three -- I'm happy with life and soul, as the two go together in phrases, and follow each other nicely IMO -- but my pics/my gallery was pushing it I admit. Sometimes you've got to use your instinct, and I couldn't finish the line on my pics, nor did I want to pick up another idea at the end of that first stanza. So it just felt right to drag it out and use another word with the "ee" sound chiming through that first verse.

I once heard somebody talk about people from Wigan, saying they never move away..."unlike scousers, who get everywhere". (I'm sort of one myself, btw.) I do feel that everywhere I go, I overhear a scouse accent. Every workplace seems to have at least one. It's that Irish wanderlust they have. Anyway, that's where it came from: but you're right, it only works if you have a similar experience.

As for imagery, if an image comes in to my head I like, I have to use it, no matter how close it is to another. Some people may find this overwhelming, but my overriding goal is not to worry to much about them, and pack a punch.

Raver and rave: This isn't careless, as I did mull over this myself when I read it back recently. The image of the raver was one I had to use. I couldn't think of an alternative to "rave review"...a decent one anyway, just "great review" or something. So I thought, sod it, I'll leave it in in the name of repetition. I'd kind of forgotten about that, but it's bugging me again now. Bah.

:-)

poetjude | February 18, 2007 - 16:24

I thought the line C:/ etc. was clever but like Jack also thought it was let down by the my gallery and my pics. The line was so cool, I forgave it immediately.

:\my docs\my life\my soul\my pics\ ....

I'd make the last word something unexpected and point making . The last word can resemble a file name and type rather than a folder name eg lostmoments.jpg

I don't agree with Jack about 'like scousers'. It does add something for me. I won't divulge exactly what as I don't want to lay bare my south-eastern predjudices!

jude

"Cacoethes scribendi"
http://www.judesworld.net

2Lou | February 18, 2007 - 16:37

'coconut shell, backing gingerly as a juggernaught'
was my favourite image.

~
www.fabulousmother.com

Jack Cade | February 18, 2007 - 18:09

I'm sure this happened last time I did some proper critique on a poem I thought deserved it. Someone felt obliged to respond by saying that the very thing I had criticised was, actually, their favourite bit. Gah! That's not an acceptable rejoinder! No offence meant, 2Lou.

2Lou | February 18, 2007 - 18:27

Okay. Maybe I should have taken the time to type:

I disagree with you, Jack. I do not think that the two comparisons - one to a coconut shell, the other to a juggernaught - corrupt one another by being in such close proximity. For me, they both added to the strength of the image.

~
www.fabulousmother.com

poetjude | February 18, 2007 - 18:52

re images - I made a similar comment about 'cash crop' by SSS. Some wonderful images but perhaps a little too many. In places it seems like over-egging the pudding. I thought it could be thinned down in places to give the poem a bit of breathing space.

But I just don't get this sense of image claustraphobia with this poem.

Even though the images are often close together, it keeps a fluency. With coconut and juggernaught, the coconut is an image that builds a picture of what it is like. Juggernaught on the other hand builds a picture of how it moves. Hence, for me, there is no conflict.

jude

"Cacoethes scribendi"
http://www.judesworld.net

Jack Cade | February 18, 2007 - 20:38

"For me, they both added to the strength of the image."

Hmm, but they *are* images in themselves. Are you saying that a coconut and a juggernaught alongside each other create a powerful juxtaposition?

Anyway, it's a small point. It doesn't have to be proven one way or the other. Jude's way of looking at it is pretty sound.

rokkitnite | February 18, 2007 - 21:19

NB - it's 'juggernaut', isn't it?

2Lou | February 18, 2007 - 23:50

“Are you saying that a coconut and a juggernaught alongside each other create a powerful juxtaposition?”

No, I was referring to the image of the moving dog that they created. Yes, I think Jude put it perfectly.

~
www.fabulousmother.com

Liana07 | March 6, 2007 - 17:19

sean... we've met before, no?

Sean Playfair | March 7, 2007 - 18:34

Have we?

Liana07 | March 7, 2007 - 20:34

I'm perhaps wrong, but you don't half ring a bell.

radiodumbo (not verified) | March 9, 2007 - 02:02

Greco.

I like some of his writing but not his forum presence.

Sean Playfair | March 9, 2007 - 09:52

I just did a search on Greco, and I agree.

Some nice work ; his forum presence I can live without.