Does this take the notion of celebrity to new heights of insanity or do we take our hats off to this woman for her chutzpah?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/booknews/7544108/Author-wins-pu...
Does this take the notion of celebrity to new heights of insanity or do we take our hats off to this woman for her chutzpah?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/booknews/7544108/Author-wins-pu...
luigi_pagano | April 6, 2010 - 15:43
Top marks for initiative, I would say.
hellen | April 6, 2010 - 15:51
Richard and Judy??? That's a new low. Good initiative I suppose but it's horrible when you think they are the benchmark for good books within the mainstream.
luigi_pagano | April 6, 2010 - 16:09
Hey Hellen, I would stoop that low if they were the only means by which I could catch the eye of a publisher. Beggars can't be choosers!
Ewan | April 6, 2010 - 18:26
Hahahaha brilliant! Bet they can't get out the front door now for manuscripts. Just what the world needs, more pastel-jacketed chick-lit! Oh well, cheek's what's needed, and that's what she has.
hellen | April 6, 2010 - 19:53
It's sad that that's probably the only means by which you can catch the eye of a publisher these days. I mean, come on Richard and Judy? When the world designated them as experts in what makes a good read, it went mad.
luigi_pagano | April 7, 2010 - 08:44
Dear lady, I don't know Richard and Judy so I can't tell whether they are experts or not and I take your word for it that they aren't.
What I'd like to know is what means, if any, you have used to catch the eye of a publisher and how successful you have been.
maggyvaneijk | April 7, 2010 - 13:10
It's sad to think you need a foreword by Richard to get published. Then again kudos to her for the initiative.
hellen | April 7, 2010 - 16:05
I'm not saying she hasn't got initiative here. All I'm saying is that it is a sad reflection on today's publishing world when you need Richard and Judy to get a break. And you have to get used to rejection as a writer, because it doesn't end just because you get published now, does it?
At the end of the day a gimmick's a gimmick, but (and this is just my opinion after all) if the writing isn't good then it won't stand up on its own.
Dynamaso | April 8, 2010 - 12:24
Given the same opportunity, I'd probably do the same thing myself. Good on her, at least she made it through the door.
Christine | April 9, 2010 - 11:36
Apparently Judy has a very good degree in Eng lit so presumably she does know something. But it's about making money. Once R & J endorsed it then the publishers knew people would buy - which is tragic because it suggests that there are (as we know) loads of good books out there that can't get published because the people writing them are 'nobodies'.
Still, I say good on the woman because her trick worked. Sadly no TV book club couples live anywhere near me.
Ewan | April 9, 2010 - 11:44
Still, Nobody's perfect: so there's still a chance, if (s)he's that good. :-)
Christine | April 9, 2010 - 15:34
Yeah. I didn't mean to suggest that this woman's book was no good. I haven't read one word of it so I wouldn't know but it must have merit. I just mean many good books must be ignored just because nobody's ever heard of the author.