Why are people so short of replying e mails?

> And that said,  that acclimatization factor was pretty quick for > mobile users.  Pity! > > Regards > Prash > > > > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Prash wrote: >> I just have no words Velu,  THank you so much and I comply with your thoughts >> >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Velu Mani Selvaraj >> wrote: >>> Dear Prash, >>> It's a sincere anguish, and I wish to add my thoughts to it, both as a >>> perpetrator and a victim of the discussed crime!! As a pereptrator, the >>> reasons, though i am not proud at pitching them, are a mix of reasonable and >>> reprehensible! >>> They are like, most times, "what should i write, a thank you would be too >>> short, I should think a bit more and reply after (meaning, i would be happy >>> to forget than think!!), or I don't even know if there would be another >>> meeting with this person, so, why bother to write..or anyways i'll meet >>> him/her and therefore i can convey/clarify then.. (an abyss >>> formed meanwhile!!) or I just don't know how to reply to this..or this kind >>> of reply would be too mundane, better not to reply than sounding >>> commonplace..or i check emails, i am yet to come to the "replying mode", or >>> simply no time, or checked email, no time to reply, the email (like the >>> needle) got lost in stack of junk mails (like the hay stack!!) the next >>> day.. sometimes it's done knowingly and sometimes it's inadvertent.. or my >>> English is not that good, may be i would be judged.. >>> Well, I think emailing is a very recent communication mode that most of us >>> have across as.. It's easy to respond to a person seen face to face, one can >>> nod his/her head, flash a smile, give a pat, wrap in a warm embrace or >>> display on offensive countenance, depending on how known the person is and >>> the kind of chemistry shared.. >>> Now, try putting those conventional expressions into words..!! I think most >>> of us of the generation are in the acclimatization phase. >>> I guess it would take a while for people to understand the concept of >>> emailing as a means of conversation and greeting.. It might get a bit of >>> acceleration with some jibes (that may not be possible if the victim is a >>> "just met kind"). I have come to understand that, that trying to know a >>> person through email is a very difficult task (for a person like me who is >>> challenged in interacting face to face..!! :-( if it's unbelievable, well, >>> here's me breaking the truth, had i been good that way, I would not have >>> resorted to email at all!! (I'm talking about the old me!!).  I have a lot >>> of trouble in the conventional greetings, so I primarily resort to writing.. >>> it gives me a better hand at my emotions and that lets me hide a lot of my >>> rustiness!!) >>> On being the victim, i take it as "the person must be too busy or the person >>> must be thinking of the reply but has not found the time to write, or may be >>> one of the reasons that i used to have to not give a reply or the person >>> must really hate me (this really puts me into depression for a while!!! :-D >>>  ) >>> Acquiring of the trait to respond to emails would make us acceptable >>> culturally (the new culture!!) and help in our development (as a person of >>> values  and as "valuable" person!!) and this reward would reinforce in us >>> the behavior, gradually. It would happen, but with a little time.. >>> So, that's what i opine.. >>> Good night, Prash! >>> Regards, >>> Velu Prashanth Suravajhala http://wiki.bioinformatics.org/Prash Did you know Bioclues.org is a virtual organization, masks projects online and builds mentor-mentee relationship? You may visit Bioclues.org or join bioclues@

Thank you very much John Regards Prash Prashanth Suravajhala http://wiki.bioinformatics.org/Prash Did you know Bioclues.org is a virtual organization, masks projects online and builds mentor-mentee relationship? You may visit Bioclues.org or join bioclues@