The religious argument:
Religion is a way of thought. It is a manner of viewing existence; ‘I think, therefore I am.’ It is also a method of discerning right from wrong. As a way of thought it is in principle correct.
The Atheist argument:
This argument is scientifically correct based on the theory of evolution. In my opinion it is however an incomplete explanation as described in my theory ‘The Law of Thought’. As such it is a scientifically correct argument, but incomplete.
The Alien theory:
The idea of this argument seems to me to have basis, however planets are not colonized by any means nor is there any interplanetary warfare. Human life is spread evenly and naturally throughout the universe since its inception. It is spread out like desert-flowers, and relative to the bigger picture, only lasts a short period of time. It is ‘seasonal’ as it occurs at certain times and places throughout space.
Explanation:
In other words no of the above theories regarding the origin of human life were right or wrong. It is merely different approaches and viewpoints regarding the same topic and each one is correct in its own sense. They were all on the right track in the end.
(It's all relative.)
