I bought the chain with my eyes
when I saw it on display –
no price tag, just a sticker that says
‘Special offer! A negotiable price!’
So I negotiated with myself,
Throwing arguments like dice,
and each argument always rolled a triple six
as if the chain on display
had all three dice jinxed.
I bought the chain with my eyes,
willed it with my flesh,
and all I hear are the clattering cries of my clattering dice...

Comments
Dynamaso | June 20, 2008 - 01:20
This is a great little homage to consumerism. The repetition of 'clattering' in the last line really works well.
jennifer | June 20, 2008 - 08:56
It's not about consumersism, it's about marriage.
Isn't it?
Love this:
'I bought the chain with my eyes
when I saw it on display'
Nathan Bednarek | June 20, 2008 - 10:00
Look up 1st John 2:16,17 in the Bible and you should guess what it is about. Thank you for your nice comments.
mark_yelland-brown | June 20, 2008 - 11:44
1 Timothy 6:11
A clatteringly good poem!!
jennifer | June 20, 2008 - 23:28
Now all I need is a Bible...
Nathan Bednarek | June 21, 2008 - 00:20
It says:
(16) because everything in the world—the desire of the flesh and the desire of the eyes and the showy display of one’s means of life—does not originate with the Father, but originates with the world. (17) Furthermore, the world is passing away and so is its desire, but he that does the will of God remains forever.
(1st John 2:16,17)
Dynamaso | June 21, 2008 - 03:51
Okay, I see it now, although if I replaced 'consumerism' with 'want' (as in desired), there wouldn't be a great deal of difference, would there? In religious terms, its still all earthly.
Nathan Bednarek | June 21, 2008 - 11:31
Yeah, you pretty much got it, but it can be about all kinds of different things. Not just the 'want' to spend money on something, but also “the desire of the flesh and the desire of the eyes” talks about things like immorality, or desiring something that doesn’t belong to you, even stealing and of course focusing on and boasting about your material life. The Bible shows that these things are useless next to what you should really value- “the will of God remains forever."
Therefore you’re all actually right. Jennifer’s interpretation of the poem as being to do with marriage doesn’t necessairly have to be wrong either, it just depends on how you look at it.
Each line in a poem should always contain possibilities, that’s how poetry can be something important but completely different for one individual to another.
jennifer | June 22, 2008 - 14:04
Ambiguity rules!
Ewan | June 24, 2008 - 10:24
'Ambiguity rules!'
Ambiguity rules OR!
Ewan | June 24, 2008 - 10:25
Very nice piece. It was pretty clear without the concordance, but it was nice of you to post it.