Compare human and chimpanzee signing.
Working for the most part in the dead of night.
Take a Saussurian semiological framework and hug it semantically.
Add ataxis, lexical parataxis and syntax.
Mix thoroughly.
These types are then illustrated quite hard.
First, the ontological development is pillaged.
Next, he who hides the data rides the shoe.
The signing behavior of chimpanzees, yes!
While chimpanzees do show evidence please.
True semiological communication is prone to seismological computation in any given semiotic consultation.
Nobody exceeds the lexical parataxis.
Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition.
The difference between syntax and lexical parataxis is six, maybe seven.
The nature of human language, hoo boy!
In conclusion: chimpy chimpy chimpy chimp.
Baby in my cup?

Comments
Ewan | March 28, 2009 - 12:47
Well I'll be a monkey's uncle!