I thought the word was chameleon.
Like many people, I bought David Bowie’s album Hunky Dory retrospectively, after being inculcated by the glam manifestos of Ziggy Stardust and Aladdin Sane.
Back in the 1970s, many vinyl albums came with an assortment of extras: posters, stickers, fan-club bumph, etc. But this didn’t even have a lyric sheet.
Hey, words are important to me. I’m a writer.
Due to a combination of Bowie’s mannered vocals and the cheap quality of my hi-fi, I misunderstood much of the record for decades, because I misheard the lyrics.
For example, in Quicksand, I’m sure there is a reference to Herod clown the desert man. And why not? As I said, it was the 70s. Songwriters were obsessed with the Hobbit and not-so-subtle sexual innuendo. All sorts of nonsense were possible. Though Bowie’s influences appeared to be more eclectic.
In the opening line of Andy Warhol, I’m equally sure he urges us to take a semen fix, which is almost better than the correct version.
It wasn’t until the 1990s, when I was replacing my vinyl collection with CDs, that I realised my mistakes. I bought the special edition of Hunky Dory, with bonus tracks and a fold-out cover inlay, inside which were printed the lyrics.
The writer in me is tempted to turn this into a metaphor about the 40-something adult realising the errors of his adolescence. Blah, blah, blah.
But here’s the thing: in the song Bewlay Brothers, I’m convinced there is a famous line chameleon, comedian, Corinthian and caricature. It’s been widely quoted, as Bowie himself has been described as a chameleon, with the ch-ch-changes of his public persona that characterised his early career.
And yet, no. According to the lyric sheet, the word is Camelian.
What does this mean? Google also insists on searching for chameleon. When I force it to narrow its parameters, I don’t see anything much that appears to be relevant. Unless there is something significant about Saint Camelian, who was Bishop of Troyes back in the 5th century.
He seems pretty obscure and I don’t know on what grounds he was canonised. There don’t seem to be any juicy stories about him.
His Saints Day is July 28th. Maybe the date is meaningful.
In interviews, Bowie has always been tight-lipped about this song. There is some speculation that it contains veiled references to his brother, who had a troubled history.
But does any of this altered perception change my opinion of the album? Do I like it any less because it is something other than what I believed?
And what does it mean for my own creative efforts? I used to get angry and dismayed when people read things into my poetry that were not there, or failed to see the things that were. How narrow-minded of me.
Like the song doesn't say: don’t conceive with belief.

Comments
oldpesky | April 8, 2011 - 12:57
Interesting piece. I still have many favourite songs that I don't know all the lyrics to but it doesn't stop my enjoyment. And I read some poems that I may not fully understand what's going on but as long as I get something from it, like the sounds of the words or a particular image, then I'm relatively pleased.
rjnewlyn | April 9, 2011 - 22:03
I'm a firm believer in the art leaving the artist and taking on its own being (even if misinterpreted) and have grave doubts about the trend for artists to explain their work (especially when it comes to biographical links). There was a composer once (I can't remember which one) who was asked what his piano piece meant so he sat down calmly in silence and played it through again.
I can see that that album without a lyric sheet could lead to all sorts of interpretations. But I wouldn't be surprised if it was some record company person who wrote out the lyrics and that the chap himself might not have been involved.
jlb | April 11, 2011 - 12:11
I'm not a huge Bowie fan so missed the references, but I still enjoyed the discussion. There are some musicians I would probably like less if I could discern what they were singing about; some mystery is good after all.
I remember one song by a band becoming something of a fan anthem of unity until the band pointed out it was actually a song about (& against) nationalism. Once a song/story etc is in the public arena it's interpretation is up to the listener etc whether the creator likes it or not. Having said that, it would probably still annoy me if someone didn't 'get' something I had written.