Blunkett's cunning attack on Short

2 posts / 0 new
Last post
Blunkett's cunning attack on Short

Blunkett is implying Clare Short is lying about the British bugging the UN Secretary General. Short claims to have seen the transcripts of Kofi Anan's conversations, and Blunket says he hasn't.

It sounds quite damning. But is it? Isn't it possible Blunkett is playing with words here? He's not saying the transcripts don't exist. He's merely saying he hasn't seen them.

And he is of course blind.

Anonymous's picture
Yes, Blunkett's blindness (quite apart from his utter stupidity), was the cause of much guffawing in south Essex today when it was reported that as 'new' Britons were sworn in both he and Jug-Ears Windsor 'looked on'.
Topic locked