Re-appraisal of French Election

The French election results were horrific, given the 3 main choices
between a bullying NAZI racist adulterer, an adulteress crook and a
decent good candidate, they chose the bullying NAZI racist adulterer
and the adulteress crook. It cannot be a coincidence that the two most
apparently evil candidates won. Although Chirac maybe a decent person
what I am referring to is the that fact many of the nastier elements of
his personality seemed to turn on many of the French electorate, so
lumbering France with the two most evil candidates. In the case of Le
Pen, he is pure evil, and his evil obviously gets some rather nasty
people in France sexually aroused, so they vote for him. The French
president has little power, this was an election on what sort of
personality the French want to represent them, they have chosen the two
most evil candidates. All the election shows is the French women are
the sort of women who get turned on by evil men and write love letters
to serial killers, while French men are the sort of men who follow the
school bully like sycophants cheering people to find him sexy. To the
point that in an election these people vote for what they have been
brainwashed to find sexy bad boys who abuse them. The idea Jospin
should feel humiliated at not winning an election where the more of a
bad boy you are the more chance you of have of winning is ridiculous.
It isn't just the French it is a problem affecting the whole of Western
society, where bullies are seen as sexier by bullies.
Most of the news items I saw in run up to the French election centred
on the public saying they found Chirac sexier than Jospin because
Chirac was a crook and a womaniser and on this basis of finding him
sexier for being disloyal and dishonest more people wanted to vote for
him. If people find evil sexy how can you expect them to vote for good.
The left needs to make people find good sexy. It is often the case that
rapists and serial killers wives are discovered to have found their
husband sexy got being evil, bullies and gangsters wives also get
aroused by evil people and think everyone does. In fact they think evil
is the main basis of sexual attraction, and are surprised when other
people do not get sexually aroused by evil people. The problem is
people like that have deeply negative affects on society, now they are
infecting the democratic process. Le Pen is just out of the
stratosphere in terms of evil he is a bully, a racist, a NAZI,
nationalist bigot, and adulterer, there is little evil he has not
committed, yet this seems to have turned the French on, or made the men
worship him as their idol that they want to be, because it is society
where some people find bullies sexy, and as a result the decent people
in France get lumbered with what bullies find sexy.
Jospin was actually labelled as boring for being good, while Chirac and
Le Pen were found to be exciting sexier for being evil. That is not
Jospin's fault or the left wings fault that French society is in a
state where the more evil you are the more the women of France find you
sexy, and the more the men of France want to be you, no wonder the
crime rate in France is rising if women in France find you sexier for
being evil.
The next time a candidate gets labelled as boring for being too nice he
should reply, "Stop getting sexually excited by bad boys, if you get
turned on by bad boys abusing you that's evil, and the idea you should
lumber us with a deliberately evil candidate because you get turned on
by bad boys is evil".
The French election merely articulated a general problem in Western
Society of what sort of people are currently seen as sexy, by bullies.
That affects real life as it encourages crime, and more bullying, and
encourages victims of bullying to suffer self-hate because they cannot
be as evil as the people who bully them. Now the problem is starting to
infect politics with specific bullies deliberately voting for other
bullies who they can relate too. Bullies think bullies are sexy
sensible people. It's like when you're at school, or adult bullying,
the bullies think they're the sensible people while the people they
bully are to them scum, they even find the evil people sexy and see the
good people as sad and unsexy.
The same is true in this country, let's face it, in a popularity
contest between the murdering rapist, throat slitter James Bond versus
Norman Wisdom, at this present time society is more revolted by
weakness from Norman Wisdom than the throat slitting of James Bond. In
this state of affairs it's no wonder evil candidates win
elections.
The left wing must start arguing back, to start persuading people not
to find bad boys sexy, not to get turned on by crooks and Nazis. In
Germany Hitler was seen as a sex icon during his leadership, the same
thing seems to be true of all dictators. Once evil is seen as sexy then
evil get's political power. All left wingers should campaign against
badness and evil being seen as sexy, if we don't,
A recent example of a candidate with rather bad personality traits
being regarded as sexy and therefore being voted in was Alan Clark,
Alan Cark had been a suspected rapists in a book it was suggested he
was, such in the grounds on which many other men have rightfully been
arrested, of forcibly having sex with a teenager, apparently it was the
daughter of a South African judge who Clark had gone to visit. Yet the
press referred this victim as a conquest due to them falling for the
old line of if the victim has sex for a second time willingly with her
abuser then they decide to disqualify it from being seen as rape. Even
though that is merely a typical emotional response from rape victims to
try and pretend they wanted to have sex, as a way of getting rid of the
humiliation, shame feeling of victim hood of being a rape victim. Yet
Alan Clark was treated as an entertaining amusing personality by the
evil media especially by the so-called liberal and far right press.
Numerous horrific pro-evil female columnists regarded him as a sexy
exciting bad boy, the same sort of women I presume who found Hitler
sexy in the 1930s and lumbered Germany with an evil dictator. The
problem is of course these people found Clark sexy because they
supported what he did they found it hilarious funny, exciting, sexy, a
breath of fresh air, instead of evil, despicable, and at least the very
least a disqualification of being a politician.
In American politics I support the democrats over the republicans, but
many aspects of Clinton's personality were immoral. Although as a
victim of bullying I supported most of Clinton's personality as he
seemed to see the seriousness of school and adult bullying, he seemed
totally unsnobbish, but the problem was many people saw him wrongly as
the bad boy of USA politics and voted for him on that basis, which is
potentially very damaging. I honestly believe that if Bill Clinton
hadn't been an adulterer he wouldn't have beaten George Bush, in the
1992 election, the public has been brainwashed by right wing
Nietzscheism media to support evil candidates, occasionally this can
play in the lefts favour if the left wing candidate has a more
aggressive nasty personality but in general it is very dangerous and
leads the gate open to an evil dictator to take power. The apparent bad
guys tend to win elections, which is extremely dangerous, it is almost
certain to leave the gates open to a dictator. An adulteress, bigoted
racist, NAZI, charismatic crook would probably beat a left wing
adulteress, charismatic crook, this is due to the dangerous mindset
society is currently in of worshiping bad guys as sexy. It's like at
school where the bully is seen as the leader the top of the reputation,
the top dog, while harmless weak wimpy people like I was were seen as
scum, that leads to a very dangerous situation as it means eventually
there is no way you won't get an evil dictator in power, we have to as
left wingers change that mindset, The only way to prevent an evil man
taking power is for the left to stop people finding evil people
sexy.
The sort of people who worship the school bully and see him as the
coolest superior person then look down on the bullied people as skin
crawling scum are very dangerous in terms of whop they will vote for in
a democracy.
I supported the Labour party over the Conservative party in the last
election. I totally disagreed with Hague's Euro sceptic, nationalist,
racist, homophobic, right wing agenda, yet the horrific fact of the
last election is that the majority of the population supported Hague's
policies, the only reason they rejected him was the deeply evil
reasoning in that they saw him as the sort of person they would bully
at school or adult life. This is deeply disturbing because it indicates
a society of snobbery where bullying hatred still exists that even
overrides other snobberies. I get bullied for being shy and quiet and
get called a weirdo for that reason, it's horrific to think the
majority of the population are that bullying, and that if you ever had
a genuine good person standing against a bully,
the bully would win every time, it's like being at school where the
bully is admired and the decent good people are hated for being sad or
wimps.
We have to stop evil being seen as sexy and exciting or else we will
end up with an evil dictator beating a good person in an election, on
the basis of an electorate hating the good candidate for being in their
eyes boring and dull for being good. Hitler won power once the public
saw him as sexy for being evil. All bullies think bullies are sexy they
have to be challenged on their mindset of evil.
It is an absolute fact that there are a large minority of people who
genuinely find bad people sexy or want to be bad people, the finding
sexy or wanting to be bad people is just as dangerous than being bad,
in terms of democracy. As people who admire or find bad people sexy
will vote for such people. These people are dangerous, they should be
confronted with their beliefs. People who vote for Chirac on the basis
of him being dishonest or Le Pen because they see him as exciting for
being bad or rebellious for being evil are dangerous for democracy,
there has to be a recognition that these people exist that they are
wrong and there views need to be argued with.
Lets face it if Le Pen did torture Algerians in his military career
that is deeply disturbing that such a man had one wife lets alone has
had tow wives who loved him for being evil. Look at the number of
horrible French women who get turned on by him being evil.
To believe that someone who finds people sexy for being a bully or an
adulterer, or dishonest to believe that those people would vote for a
good candidate is simply naive.
It is not anti-democratic to argue against the more evil people views,
there is no sensible reason why they should expect respect, it is not
as if people like that are voting out of a non altruistic reason. If
people vote for these racist or crooked candidates out of confusion out
of political ideology that is a starting point because you can argue
with them the problem is many people who vote for these candidates,
vote for them because they are evil they admire the evil candidate, to
the point where they are prepared to warp debates totally to support an
evil view. This is simply not the case at present with mainstream
politics, where people genuinely want what is best they will go with
what is pragmatic, they may have deeply ideological views. There are
people on the Euro sceptic and racist, and pro crooked politicians who
will deliberately warp the facts, creating deliberately evil
attitudes.
There are deliberately evil people who worship Nietzsche who
deliberately supported evil, who are proud to be evil. There are
Nietzsche people in society there are people who fancy bad boys sexy.
To believe everyone who votes for an evil candidate doesn't realise
they are evil is na?ve. There are people who fancy evil people why on
earth would they vote for a good candidate, why would someone who
basically worships evil vote for a good candidate and why should the
good guy candidates get blamed for the fact that some nasty people get
sexually aroused by bullies. It isn't Jospin's fault that French people
found Le Pen sexier for being pure evil.
You may think there are no people who are proud to be evil, but you
just take a look at the number of fifty year old men and women who
still boast about being school bullies, and know how much damage their
bullying does and still being proud to be bullies. People like that
still vote in elections. You look at the number of journalists who
boast about fancying bad boys. It is lunacy to expect them to vote for
the good candidate.
We have to stop people being sexually attracted to bullies, and we must
stop people being proud to be bullies.
I am merely saying that political commentators vastly underestimate the
proportion of Chirac and especially Le Pen's vote who voted for the
person out of supporting evil, because they find evil sexy, exciting,
while they find good boring and dull, you cannot expect people like
that to ever vote for any good candidate as long as they have that
mindset, that mindset has to changed.
It is not anti the public or anti-democratic to recognise that some
people are not very nice, dictators are normally created by elites who
find evil sexy, but you get that everywhere, in a society where James
Bond, and Russell Crowe slitting someone's throat is regarded as a the
perfect man while Mr Bean and Frank Spencer in some mothers doav'em are
seen as disgusting for being weak, if society continues along that line
it is almost impossible to believe we will not eventually elect a
deeply deeply evil candidate, who will be regarded as masculine, a real
man, sexy, strong and exciting.. Politics isn't just about finding out
what people think and adapting you party to that view, it is also about
trying to persuade people and if we don't counter act the increasingly
niece sexuality of society then in my opinion we will elect a deeply
evil leader within a period of decades. If a society sees James Bond as
sex god, while it hates weakness in the form of Mr Bean, then it is
almost impossible to see that society developing into a good society.
You have to say there is a problem with a society where Jospin is hated
as boring for being good and Le Pen is seen as exciting and sexy for
being basically pure evil. That is not Jospin's fault, that is the
French public's fault.
Too much credence is given to the patronising idea that people voted
for Le Pen and Chirac out of fear of crime or real life problems, in
reality a large number of people vote on the basis of personality. You
think back to school and remember the most popular people were normally
the most sadistic dangerous bullies and the most hated normally the
good guys. It's like expecting the daddy in prison to be a nice guy,
that problem is starting to infect politics. Unfortunately some people
vote for the nastiest person because they are nasty and see good people
as na?ve and weak and evil people as sexy, exciting, strong, and
ruthless, winners and clever. It is na?ve to think bullies like that
would vote for a good person. The only way the left can seriously
counter the right is by attacking the sexual attraction towards and
pride to be bullies that exists in many many bullies. Calling the
people who voted for Le Pen as working class desperate people is
inaccurate. The vast majority of his voters are male bullies, and women
who are sexually aroused by bad men who abuse them. These are deeply
dangerous evil people who should not be respected as giving a sensible
voice