I have entitled this ZZZZZZZZZZZZZ to get it last in alphabetical
order. I have listed a collection of my articles on issues.
Here are the contents.
1. LIBERALISM. TWO DIFFERENT TYPES OF FREEDOM
2. GENDER HATRED
3. BEING HATE FILLED ISN'T AUTOMATICALLY BAD
4. LOVE - WHAT MORE IN THE NAME OF LOVE?
5. J - THE ULRIKA RAPE CASE MAN
6. CRIMINALIZE FANCYING BAD BOYS
7. W. - BULLYING IS NOT CUTE -
8. MONGS AND WIERDOES AND THE BIGOTRY TOWARDS US
9. FEMINISM IS NOT ABOUT MAKING EVIL PEOPLE WIN.
10. DOES EVERYONE DO IT?
11. Evil women fancy evil men
12. IMPEDE PEOPLE WHO FANCY BAD BOYS FROM VOTING
13. ESTROGEN MAKES PEOPLE MORE VIOLENT
14. REAL MEN - WHY I HATE REAL MEN
1. LIBERALISM. TWO DIFFERENT TYPES OF FREEDOM
There are two contradictory types of freedom, one is for the abusers
and the other is for the abused or potential victims. When bullies and
fascists talk about freedom they're not talking of the freedom I want.
Some bullies and fascists call themselves libertarians or the freedom
party, but they're not speaking of the liberation and freedom which I
would want. They want a different kind of freedom and liberation. I
want freedom from abuse they speak of the freedom to abuse. When they
talk of liberation, they mean liberation from morality. They mean
liberation from good. They mean liberated to be evil. When they talk of
tolerance they talk of tolerance of evil. When they talk of freedom
they talk of the freedom of dictators, despots and abusers to commit
any evil they like. They talk of the freedom to abuse others for their
entertainment. They talk of the freedom to abuse others for their
pleasure. They talk of the freedom to racially abuse others, or to
bully children, or to abuse children, or to beat people up for being
gay or to beat up their wife or to bully people or to rip animals to
shreds, or to find deeply deeply evil people sexy for being evil. The
freedom to abuse argument if also used by paedophiles, school bullies,
rapists and other evil people. The bullies and fascists and the
paedophiles views of freedom are totally different to the concept of
freedom of a victim of abuse, but as no one has challenged their evil
concept of freedom then their concept of freedom has been aloud to
infect others views of freedom.
To them feminism is not the measure of goodness with equal rights which
I originally saw feminism as. Many NEO-Nazis have created a warped evil
version feminism to justify finding deeply evil men sexy and
supporting, tolerating and trivialising wife beating, rape and
bullying. Many evil right wingers have even started pretending it is
feminist to tolerate and trivialise rape because they find deeply evil
men sexy. Often the more evil a man is the more manly and sexy the far
right see that person as. Many bullies and fascists even confuse
liberalism with tolerating abuse, so they classify themselves as
liberal for tolerating deeply serious abuse of others. Some bullies and
fascists even regard themselves as liberal for finding deeply evil
abusive men as sexy.
Believe it or not many of them even talk of Satan as a liberating
force, because to them to be good is to controlled while to breed evil
is to be free. I am not religious I don't believe in all this Satan
religion stuff, but Satan is a very important fictional character
encompassing all evils. I was discussing this freedom issue with
someone on the ABC tales website the other day with a person who saw
Satan as a liberating force. I don't know the person's political or
moral views exactly but I feel he was conned to believe that Satan was
a liberator by abusers and bullies and fascists. To many bullies and
fascists Nietzsche was a liberating force because to them to be good is
to imprisoned they see good people as oppressors.
When abusers talk about freedom they're not speaking of the freedom we
need, the freedom to not be abused, bullied, a victim of crime a victim
of racism, sexism, bullying, of bigotry, of violence. They talk of
those abuses as rights they deserve to commit freely. There are far to
many dangerous deeply abusive evil people who think to be prevented
from being evil is restriction from freedom. The freedom argument is
being used to justify despicable evil actions views for paedophiles,
rapists, racists, bullies, wife beaters, people who fancy bullies and
bad boys, serious criminals of all sorts, homophobic people, sexist
people. The use of the term freedom is becoming more popular amongst
abusers of all sorts. It is about time that people who disagree with
these sorts of abuses spoke out against their ideology of freedom to
abuse. It is the freedom from abuse we should be aiming for. There are
two basic diametrically opposed versions of what freedom is, these are
the freedom to abuse and the freedom not to be abused. I wonder whose
side the bullies and fascists are on.
2. GENDER HATRED
It does not make you a man hater for hating rapists and wife
beaters.
Why is it when ether you get women who complain about rapists and wife
beaters, then the men and women who support abuse are aloud to call
them men haters. Remember when Mike Tyson called the women who
complained about his rape, men haters.
And if you insult women that fancy bad boys then you get called a women
hater.
The logic of the gender hatred label is totally the wrong way round. It
should be if you are a bully or you fancy people for abusing people you
are seen as a bad evil person. Why is it bullies now think it is manly
for men to rape and bully. They even think that all women find men sexy
for abusing people. Bullies and people who fancy bullies should stop
being aloud to get away with using the response. Women and men should
hate wife beaters and rapists.
I hate men who abuse and I hate women who support abusers (bullies,
rapists etc:). Not all men abuse and not all women support or find sexy
men for abusing people. It is just evil people who do.
It doesn't make you a man hater for hating rapists or wife beaters. It
doesn't make you a women hater for hating women who support abusers. It
just make you a hater of abuse and a hater of the people who support,
commit and encourage abuse.
I have every right to hate bullies and people who support bullies, and
don't come out with typical bullying warped logic of saying I am the
scary one for hating people who abuse me.
People who think it is manly to abuse and think men are meant to abuse
are pure evil. People who find people sexy for bullying or other abuse
are evil. That doesn't make me a women hater, or scary, or dangerous,
or pathetic for hating a specific type of pro evil women, who are
responsible for huge amounts of propaganda and support of abuse
themselves. Not all women are like that it is just evil women who
support and are sexually aroused by abuse.
3. BEING HATE FILLED ISN'T AUTOMATICALLY BAD
A few months ago when Martin Amis was giving interviews on his book. I
am not against Martin Amis. I don't know much about his views, but I
did think he vaguely came close to supporting an idea that has been
annoying me. He spoke of how utopians are filled with hate. This
annoyed me because it articulated to me a growing problem of many
people who commit serious abuses. They seem to hate you for being
abused. Amis seemed to say that all Utopians were filled with hate.
What annoyed me about that comment was that he said it as if that
dismissed all Utopians and all people who hate abuse. It is horrifying
to me that abusers are so arrogant that they think hating them makes
you hate filled but if they hate then a you are normally dehumanised
scum to them then they decide that doesn't mean they hate
anything.
There is nothing wrong with hating being abused. There is nothing wrong
with hating abusers. All very well to go on about forgiveness, but when
you start hasting and dismissing victims of abuse and their views
because they have natural responses of hatred to their abusers, or the
poverty, or negative situation they are in then that is sick and awful.
This is not specifically a critic of Amis, as I have noticed many other
bullies, or abusers have got the idea the being the one filled with
hate makes you the bad guy automatically.
Being hate filled is normally a response to some sort of abuse and they
idea of dismiss someone's views because they are hate filled is insane,
and rather nasty. If you look at victims of child abuse, bullying, many
other forms of abuse or injustice they are often haste filled driven to
despair by some abuse, mental illness or situation. It is sick to me
that Amis or any abuser would dismiss someone for being hate
filled.
Many Utopians just want the sort of things other people take for
granted. Many communists just wanted a decent good standard of life,
they don't expect something unrealistic.
All I am saying is abusers should stop thinking their victims are the
bad guys for hating being abused. If your victim hates you that's you
fault not there's.
I am not specifically against Amis, I am not a communist it is just
that he vaguely articulated a philosophy that has been annoying me that
of abusers hating their victims of hating them. There is noting wrong
with hated being the emotion that caused you political ideology what
matters is what you hate.
4. LOVE - WHAT MORE IN THE NAME OF LOVE?
It is only recentely the U2 song "What more in the name of love" has
made sense to me. I always used to think it was meant as some subtle
reference to religion, maybe it was, but recentley I have found out
many people who bully or love people for abusing other people justify
their abuse or support of the abuse of others on the basis they love or
are sexually aroused by abusing other people, or that they love people
for abusing other people. They don't seem to see loving abuse or loving
others for abusing others is pure evil. Being sexually aroused by
abusing other people is evil. Being sexually aroused by people abusing
other people is evil. It is about as romantic as couples who kill
people. To many bullies justify support of abuse on the basis they love
or gain pleasure wrecking other people's lives. Too many people who
fancy bullies seem to think that love is above everything even above
other people. so they love people deliberately for abusing people to
terrible misery and still think they are being romantic when they are
just being evil.
Here is a list of thing you should not love doing:
Paedophilia
Bullying
Murder
Rape
Racism
Snobbery
Bigotry
Committing any evil
Terrorism against the innocent
Wrecking good peoples lives
Finding people sexy for doing any of the abuses listed above.
Loving people for doing any of the abuse listed above or other abuses
of people.
NAZIs tend to think the holocaust as sexy because your sexual
attraction and basis of loving people is governed by your morality.
Loving is evil is just evil. Being sexually aroused by evil is just
evil. Stop justifying abuses or your support of abuses on the basis of
the emotional reactions that cause you to be evil.
The fact some people enjoy abusing people is the main reason some
people abuse people. You cannot justify abuse on the basis you enjoy,
love are sexually aroused by wrecking other people's lives or that you
find people sexy for being life wreckers such as bad boys etc. You
cannot justify fancying abusers on the basis you find your lover
wrecking other peoples lives sexy. Love is not above everything it is
just an emotion. What matters is why you have the emotional reaction.
Morality is above everything, as a means of stopping people gaining
their pleasure by wrecking other people's lives.
5. J - The Ulrika rape case man
A confident out-going person suspected of rape.
Why is it whenever a quiet person does anything wrong the media always
says "Loner quiet person does murder", but whenever a loud out-going
person does anything evil no one says out-going confident person
suspected of rape. I bet most rapists and murderess are snide bullies
who picked on people at school.
My theory is that the media is dominated by bullies, and that they want
to justify to themselves why they bullied people at school or why they
fancy bad boys so they want to say it is the people they hate who are
dangerous. The same thong happens where I live. The bullies have grown
up to regard me and my good pals as the scary ones, for being quiet and
shy. When they are still thugs who tolerate rape and they think a wife
beating bullying thug is an OK person. I hear some of them on the bus
once going on about how one of their pals had been charged with rape. I
remembered the guy they were talking about, he was an aggressive,
bullying, snide, snobby thug, yet the bullies were saying "Oh no he
wouldn't do it not the type of person". Ofcourse he bloody well was the
type of person. But bullies think bullies are just being men for
abusing people. They fear the harmless god men.
Bullies are evil and they aren't all stupid don't patronise them, they
are just evil people with evil mindsets and totally 100\\\\\\\\\% evil
ideas. They fear good men and worship bullies and thugs, they fin abuse
and abusers sexy. They have warped ideas that it is manly to
abuse.
I realise some abused or quiet people do serious crimes, but most of it
is done by bullying snide snobs, who are capable of convincing
themselves what they did was not an act of abuse, but just part of
growing up or part of being man. They are sick evil people. They wreck
lives and then they think what they do is trivial.
6. CRIMINALIZE FANCYING BAD BOYS
I hate bad boys and people who support bad boys and especially people
who find them sexy. They're evil. They get turned on by other people
being abused. They judge evilness as the chief factor in judging sexual
attraction, the more evil you are the more sexy and manly they see you
as. They think the most sexually demanding and sexy man in the world is
the most evil man in the world. They are warped twisted evil people who
abuse the vulnerable and give support to the abusers. Yet somehow they
think they are good people. They would dump their bad boys for even
more evil men. They see good people as dehumanised empty meaningless
scum, as to them the only way to gain pleasure is by abuse, so if you
don't gain pleasure from abuse they think you don't have any emotions
at all. They see evil people as exciting and deep. They are evil
psychopaths and like all psychopaths they see their victims as
dehumanised scum and they see the people who do the abuse as the only
people who matter. People who fancy bad boys are very very evil. What i
really hate is the way they boast of fancying people for abusing other
people as if it makes them sophisticated and clever or even whimsical
for fancying deeply evil people. They are just evil end of story. They
would probably find the holocaust the most manly, sexy, interesting,
exciting something extra event in history. People who fancy bad boys
are just evil end of story.
7. BULLYING IS NOT CUTE
Why is it that bullies think that bullies and bullying is cute. There
are deeply terrifying evil thugs who think when they beat people s
brains in they are being cute. Bullying is never cute. The only people
who find evil cute are evil people. If you find evil cute then you're
evil. Loads of really terrifying thugs think that when they beat people
up they are being cute It is especially their true that their evil
wives and girlfriends think that too, about their evil husbands, they
even think it when they do bullying and make snide remarks about
people. Loads of thugs or their girlfriends say "I just haven't grown
up" or "He just hasn't grown up". It's rubbish they're just evil thugs
as they were when they were kids, and as they are now. Bullying is
never cute. I didn't find cute even when I was ten and was being abused
by other ten year olds. I certainly wouldn't find it cute to be beaten
up now. The problem is these evil people genuinley think it s cute to
bully. They bullied as kids and think it is part of growing up. If it
was snide insults then they grow up thinking I's cute to bully people
to suicide by snide insults or to make horrible remarks to people. They
always say it's just part of growing up. I think its because they
bullied people when they were kids, so they think as they did it as
kids and thought they were cute doing it when in reality they were
really really evil then aswell, now as adults they do the same sort of
bullying and have an even more evil idea that they are cute childlike
people. They are not they're just evil. Loads of people who bullied me
at university spoke in really childish voices. I admit I spoke in
childish voices too sometimes but more out of depression, or
submission. These ones did it thought as if they thought they were
being cute, when they were just horrific evil people. One women I
remember would talk like she thought she was a really care free joker,
she was just an horrific nasty piece of shit. I hated her guts, loads
of other people who she bullied did too. Although i doubt the
psychopathic bullies regard that as important. I bet rapists, and
paedophiles also think they are cute.
In realty does reach an incredible extent when you have football
hooligans killing people and their evil wives think there just being
boys just doing what lads too, just being cute.
Let me just re-iterate this, bullying is not cute it wasn't cute as a
kid, it was terrifying, soul breaking, capable of causing suicide and
you knew what you were doing. The only people who find bullying cute,
are evil bullies who fancy or are bullies. If you find abuse or abusers
cute you are evil.
The problem is these bullies have kids and think it is cute and just
being a kid for there own kids to bully, so their own kids get brought
up with the sick idea it is cute to abuse people. Even when they bully
some old aged pensioner to suicide they think it's just being cute. I
mean grown adults regarding it as cute to watch their kids bullying
some mentally disabled kid or an old aged pensioner.
You are just evil for bullying people you are not being cute. I think
one reason why bullies think they are cute is to let themselves get
away with the abuse to stop feeling guilt, so that if they pretend
children are incapable of empathy then by pretending to themselves
they're being childlike they can pretending it is OK. Well it doesn't
work. Bullies are just evil.
8. MONGS AND WIERDOES AND THE BIGOTRY TOWARDS US
In youth culture the term mong is a very widely used as a term used to
indicate hatred to what the bullying snobs would regard as inferiors.
This term is often described towards me as I am socially a shy sort of
untidy person who snobs and bullies tend to hate passionately for those
reasons. They even feel intense anger with you for complaining that you
don't like being bullied as if you're so inferior you're supposed to be
happy about being abused.
Bigotry to mongs and weirdoes is a serious problem, and shouldn't
exist. It is a major cause of bullying, depression, suicide. As far as
I'm concerned it's the main barrier to blocking me from having a good
career. I went to university and had to put up with people who hated me
for being shy, inadequate, mongish. I thought I could get a job with my
good degree then I find I can't get a job because the same people
decide who get jobs and they decide they don't want me to work. And
then you get insulted as a doley by the same people. It is
discrimination.
People won't employ me because they think I won't fit it. While they
employ bullies who hate me and are the ones who ensure I don't fit
it.
Mongs are a discriminated minority. Why are there loads of horrible
snobby bullies who hate mongs. What have mongs ever done. It's just
snobbery to people they see as inferior. They shiver when they see
mongs and their skin crawls they are horrible snide bullies.
They dehumanise you and start hating you, see you with some sort of
disdain, like you make their skin crawl.
If you're inferior they think you deserve to die or live in terrible
depression and they enjoy your suffering when they bully you.
Mongs are a discriminated minority. And who came up with name mong it's
racist against Mongolians. It was probably some racist snob who went to
Mongolia and said "Ha Ha, look at all those people with funny faces,
their so poor and uneducated, I hate them". What a snobby bully, he was
just like people who hate mongs. How do Mongolians feel about being
used as a term of abuse, it's racism and xenophobia.
So many bullies say that bullying is a difficult thing to judge,
because things they regard as fair play are actually deeply hurtful.
Being seen as scum, for being quiet, or inadequate is being a victim of
bullying. Hating people for being sad, mongish, shy, weird, is evil
bullying snobbery. Getting everyone to hate people for being shy quiet,
weird, sad, weird is evil bullying, trying to make people hate them is
bullying. There's no doubt about that. It's ganging up on people it's
social isolation the bullies knows what their doing, don't pretend its
trivial.
That reputation thing is bullying. To start ranking people and making
clear to people you think they're scum is bullying whether you like it
or not that is bullying. The bullies would make clear to me how much
they hated me in the way they looked and what they said about me in
really soul breaking disdainful manners. The whole reputation thing at
school is really soul breaking evil. That is bullying forcing social
isolation. It's a snide sophisticated evil method of bullying. It is
not trivial. It is one of the major causes of suicide forcing social
isolation.
The worst thing is when bullies bully you with beatings and insults,
and think they have done nothing wrong, but then they do something
trivial to their pal and feel intense guilt about that.
That's when you start to think you're scum. Bullying should be a
serious crime with life long imprisonment.
One thing I hate about bullies they bully you into being inadequate and
then complain in adult life about you being inadequate, when most of
time it is their fault.
9. FEMINISM IS NOT ABOUT MAKING EVIL PEOPLE WIN.
Why is it loads of really horrible snide bullies think that feminism is
about supporting nasty people bullying people and fancying horrible
men. Since when did feminism become about making evil people win.
Feminism is about equal right not letting bullies, snobs, and wife
beaters win on the basis some evil person is sexually aroused by them
out of some desire for their children to inherit the evil man's
personality so they can win by being evil. Feminism should be about
good women and good men winning against evil men and evil women. It
should not be about some horrible woman getting turned on watching some
horrible man wreck people's lives for her entertainment. Whenever you
complain about evil people who fancy bad boys then you get criticised
by the snobby snide bullies as some sexist mean person. The thing is
they like sexist bullies anyway because they see them as manly for
being evil. They get sexually aroused thinking of their boyfriend or
husband seriously abusing people and the more he abuses people the more
they like them, and then they think that is trivial and whimsical
sophisticated to love such evil men and that we should let them get
away with that. I hate people like that. The if you complain they start
telling you how pathetic you are not being in school rugby team when
you were a kid, which seems to be their main basis of judgment of
peoples lives. They think it is manly to beat up your wife, to kill, to
rape, to bully to abuse, to beat up children, to bully, to be snobby,
to bully people with learning disabilities, to basically do any evil is
in their eyes is manly. Just like all evil societies they try to
glamorise evil as manly, so they can encourage men to do more abuse and
tell them they are doing what they are meant to do.
I'm not sexist and I'm not mean, I just hate bullies and I hate people
who support and reward their evil bullying. Not all women fancy bullies
and men who abuse but bullies think so. People who fancy evil men are
evil as they make evil men win, taunt their victims and the evil men
often justify their behaviour on the basis their evil wife finds them
sexy for wrecking people's lives. They often mock good men for being
good and deliberately try to bully good men into being abusive bullying
men. I hate such people.
I am fed up with all those horrible propagandists who support evil men
and come out with snide arguments in defence of them in saying they're
more manly, fun, exciting, sexy, for wrecking people's lives. In their
view the holocaust is the most manly sexy, fun, exciting thing that has
ever happened they probably watch videos of NAZI concentration camp SS
soldiers, and as they watch them they say out loud 'Ooh he's a bad boy
I'd like to watch him wreck some more people's lives so we can breed
more evil descendents'.
The worst thing is though they now think people should be free to be
evil and that people should be free to fancy evil bullies who wreck
lives and have some evil notion that is part of feminism to make evil
men win and to want your kids to grow up to be evil abusive snide
people who wreck other peoples lives. If you criticise them they have
this really crappy notion that you're being sexist for not letting some
evil couple be evil and win by being evil. Why on earth they expect
people to stand back and let some evil bullies win is beyond me. They
even think they're romantic for gaining sexual pleasure from wrecking
people's lives. It's about as romantic as the Rose and Fred West good
sex guide. Since when did not liking horrible bullies make you sexist
and mean? Why on Earth do snide horrible bullies think modernity and
feminism is about evil bullies having the freedom to wreck innocent
people's lives and make evil men win? Modernity and feminism should be
about the progression to a good society free of all evils such as
people who get turned on by men who abuse people, and people who laugh
and get sexually aroused watching other people suffer. Modernity and
feminism should not be about selecting some natural selection of evil
society, where people find evil men sexy, for wrecking other peoples
lives and pretending that that's harmless whimsical fun. I hate all men
who abuse, bully, rape and do any other evil. I hate all people who
fancy such evil people. People who fancy evil men are evil and it is
not feminist to support such evil people who love such evil men, it is
just evil We now even have a point where far right wing female
columnists have started trivialising rape on the nasty basis that it is
only men who get hurt by rape. Look at those evil snobby evil pro evil
psychopathic evil people who fancy Mike Tyson, or Le Pen they should
all be locked up, all they do is make evil men win and encourage more
people to get bullied, raped, abused, and have their lives wrecked
because some evil shit gets sexually aroused thinking how evil and
terrifying their evil lover is. I hate people who fancy bad boys. All
they do is make evil men win, bully the man's victims, and campaign for
more men to be evil, they bring their own sons up to be bullies, they
hate their own sons if they're bullied, they encourage their daughters
to marry wife beaters, they even get turned on by men who beat them,
and they say how grateful they are for the excitement of being married
to a deeply dangerous man who abuses other people. They are almost
always bullies or otherwise psychopathic nasty people who support their
husband abusing people and pretend that all men are born to be
psychopaths just because they get sexually aroused by psychopaths. I
really hate people who fancy bullies they're evil and should be locked
up, mainly because I hate it when evil men win, but also because they
encourage and reward and support other men to be evil. Often bullies
will justify their own abuse of people on the basis their wife or
girlfriend or other people get sexually aroused by them committing
abuse. The fact your wife or girlfriend finds you sexy for being evil
is not a justification it just means she's evil as well, and gets
pleasure out of you wrecking people's lives. I hate people who fancy
bad boys equally for those reasons, they are horrible people who make
bad boys win and reward and encourage men to be evil. People who fancy
bad boys should be imprisoned.
There are literally loads of old ex-feminists who have professed
trivialisation of rape, or a sexual attraction to Mike Tyson for being
a despicable evil bad boy. People who fancy bad boys should be locked
up and certainly not allowed to pretend there views are trivial and
whimsical, or cleverly sophisticated. They deliberately gain pleasure
from other people's abuse so they are evil.
10. DOES EVERYONE DO IT?
Why is it the "Everyone does it" excuse has started growing again as a
justification for committing abuse. You name any evil and you'll find
loads of people who commit that evil, using the nonsensical excuse
"Everyone does it". Racism, bullying, car robbery, burglary,
paedophilia, people who committed serious human rights abuses in the
Yugoslav wars and the holocaust, rape, infidelity, fancying evil men.
No matter what evil it is there will be people who committed that abuse
saying everyone does it as if it justifies what they did.
I first noticed this when a kid when I saw a TV programme of adults
talking about bullying. Bullying wrecked my school and university life,
it's as serious as paedophilia or rape, it causes suicides, life long
depression, wrecks lives, it is often murder. Yet I noticed loads of
adults would say well everyone's done a bit of bullying, as if it made
it OK. I didn't bully I knew loads of people who didn't but as we were
meaningless scum to bullies, they decided we weren't real people so
they decided that as their fellow evil pals bullied that everyone was
therefore a bully. So in their logic that made their abuse OK. To me
the Everyone does it argument is a rubbish excuse attempting to
trivialise abuse by saying we all did it so let's pretend where
magnanimous for forgiving ourselves for wrecking other people's lives,
in an alliance of abusers agreeing that they didn't do something wrong.
So even when they feel a tinge of guilt they can gather round and tell
themselves there's nothing wrong with being a bully. It's like
paedophiles agreeing that forgiving each other makes their abuse
acceptable, without even bothering to remember it's their victims who
suffered.
Exactly the same thing happens with snobbery. I heard a radio four
discussion show about snobbery where one of the panellists said
everyone's a snob. Once again that is utter nonsense. The problem is
bullies tend to be pals with bullies and regard everyone else as
dehumanised scum so that as their bullying pals agree with them they
think everyone does the form of abuse they commit.
There is virtually no evil where there has not been someone who commits
the abuse who then says well everyone does it. In fact this excuse
often leads off to a state where you're regarded as weird (weirdness is
the biggest sin a bully's view) for not abusing people. After the
Serbian - Bosnian War where many Serbian men used rape as a weapon of
war. A BBC documentary team went to Bosnia to interview Serbs who
committed offences. Numerous men admitted they had raped women, but
then said everyone did it. Yet those men didn't seem to notice that
other men had not raped. Why was it some good men had not felt because
lots of men were abusing people that made it ok, yet the evil abusers
felt that would work as an excuse.
The excuse even reaches burglary. A few months ago a film got on my
nerves for this reason, it was a film starring Will Smith and Gene
Hackman where the Will Smith character said after being robbed well we
all did stuff like this when we were kids, and then his pal says "Yeah
we did". Well I didn't hardly anyone does.
I even overheard car thieves of my own age going on about how everyone
robs cars. Why can't they understand very few people rob cars.
Even with infidelity I remember hearing recently someone on a TV
programme saying 95\\\\% of men would have affairs if offered. Well
that's rubbish, less than half would but the bullies who do horrible
things, are so confident because they abuse people and don't care, and
scare their victims into not replying, that no one has the guts to say
you're not in the majority you're evil and even if you were in the
majority you'd still be evil.
Recently I heard Melvyn Bragg's Thursday radio four programme an
interview with a man who has written nothing but racist snooty nosed
pro bullying evil propaganda novels saying that everyone is a racist.
It was a nonsensical statement, but he felt that as he was a racist,
and all his pals were racist then everyone must be racist.
Women who fancy bad boys always think every women fancies and boys, and
supports people abusing other people. When it is just them and their
evil pals that get sexually aroused by evil men.
There are numerous reasons for the everyone does it excuse one is to
say everyone does it so it doesn't matter, so they can trivialise the
serious abuse and carry on committing it pretending it doesn't matter,
another is that by saying everyone does it, they can all gather
together as abusers and agree amongst themselves, and bully their
victims to accept, that they are really forgiving people for forgiving
themselves and fellow abusers for forgiving their own serious abuse.
Then there's the other more common reason for the everyone does it
excuse, one of hatred of weirdoes. Alot of bullies and abusers hate
weirdoes as a person who get's bullied for that reason in hate that
gets on my nerves. I get labelled as a weirdo for being shy, quiet
having a funny voice, finding it almost impossible to talk to people,
most bullies hate weirdoes more than anything else you can imagine, in
fact they have no sympathy for any weirdness, as in being shy, but
expect unbelievable levels of forgiveness for their own evils of
bullying and other abuse. The thing is this hatred of weirdoes, causes
the phrase everyone does it to be a way of making the evil abuse seem
like the positive action as at least it isn't weird. Therefore that
classifies the abuse as normal and anyone who doesn't commit the abuse
as weirdo, which they hate, and to them the weirdoes are the real
immoral, bizarre creepy, dangerous people.
Bullies always try to bully you into thinking your view is sad and
their view is the only one that counts, they make you feel like scum
they get other people to see you as sad weird scum so that anything you
say is seen as diseased weird rubbish. Bullies are ruthless evil people
no evil should be tolerated on the basis that a majority of people do
it.
11. EVIL WOMEN FANCY EVIL MEN
I am fed up with these nauseating Killroy type TV programmes shown time
and time again where you get the question 'Why do women fancy bad
boys'. Firstly not all do and secondly the major reason is 'Evil people
like evil people, and want their kids to inherit the ability to be
evil'. No one is ever aloud to the say the real reason why some
horrible nasty people fancy horrible nasty people. Instead we have to
listen to their rubbishy crappy nauseating excuses that persuade more
people to be snide evil bullies, and to fancy horrible snide bullies,
and to pretend there's nothing wrong with making evil people win.
People who love bullies are evil. When they have sons, if their sons
are bullied at school they don't help them they just hate them. People
who love bullies are more damaging and horrific than you society
pretends and I am fed up with everyone patronising them. They're just
nasty people, they are not victims, or romantic they are evil nasty
bullies who enjoy wrecking people's lives, and gain sexual pleasure
from wrecking peoples lives by bullying and other forms of abuse.
When I was at school and university the same number of men and women
bullied me. Of the women who bullied me for being shy and quiet, they
also fancied bullies. There were also many couples of men and women who
would both bully vulnerable people at the same time. I never thought
for a minute that there was any wonder about why those specific women
would fancy bullies. They fancied them because they were bullies or
they supported bullying, they loved horrible nasty men, and hated men
who got bullied with a horrible snobby contempt. Yet then we get these
horrible TV programmes about why do some women like bad boys as if the
women who like bad boys are angelic nice people, who are being
corrupted by some big bad boy and even more nauseating that all women
fancy really evil men which is utter rubbish. It's as sensible as
saying all men fancy Rose West, or that all women fancy Adolf Hitler,
but bullies always get away with thinking everyone is like them,
because they bully people not to point out they're evil horrible
people. Here is a list of excuses people who fancy bullies use for
fancying bullies. The only reason people fancy bad boys is they want
their children to inherit he ability to be evil and they want win by
being evil. It is not an evolutionary programmed desire it is
deliberate conscious choice. People who fancy evil people are evil
people. Anyone who fancies evil people is evil and it doesn't matter
what else the do.
I get really really annoyed when I hear about people who fancy people
for wrecking other people's lives. It like evil gets to win for being
evil.
I have written al list of excuses people who fancy evil people use and
my arguments against their views.
List of excuses people who fancy bad people use, with my arguments
against their defences
We all want to tame the bad boy
That is said by horrible people who want to tame a bad boy to have on a
leash who everyone is scared of and who they can breed horrible nasty
bullying people from to win by being evil. It's like people who breed
put bull terriers. They just want some evil beast under their control
to abuse people, and bully people. People like that are just evil nasty
people.
Being evil is manly
All evil cultures such as the NAZIs, Vikings, Romans, Taliban, Serbian
ethnic cleansers like to proclaim evil as manly. This justifies why
they abuse and why the people of the societies support the abuse. In
reality evil is not manly and men are not even naturally more violent,
but they desperately want to believe this to justify their support of
evil men. To them the holocaust would be a sexy, manly event.
I want a real man
Real men is just another term for psychopathic cowboys, Vikings and
gladiators. It's part of the glamorising evil as manly. This has been a
problem throughout history.
I am standing up for working class men by supporting evil men
Loads of people who are involved in supporting bullies do so because
they love men who abuse people, or are bullies themselves, and like to
patronise the problem by pretending all working class people are
violent snide bullying thugs, which is not true, but as the bullies
want to justify their own behaviour and support for nasty people they
proclaim they are acting in a working class way, or that they are
standing up for the working class, if they wanted to stand up for the
working class they would not support bullies abusing people to
depression and suicide. People who fancy bullies are not altruistic
people looking for a better world they're ruthless evil people who want
more evil people.
Loads of upper class and middle class people are snide bullying thugs
and fancy each other for being bullies. Saying bullies are all just
broken working class unemployed men is patronising crap, and I say that
as an unemployed working class man. I got bullied far more at
university by snide snobby bullies, and look at the number of bullying
wealthy MP's there are.
As long as you're ok to your kids your OK
Basically a line used by many evil people so you can abuse and cause as
much pain as could ever be caused to other people but in their
Nietzscheism eyes as long as you treat your own well then your OK. It's
the same line the NAZIS used, despite killing millions in concentration
camps they were OK to their own kids and decided that in their own evil
view that made them OK. Bullies use that excuse all the time. All nasty
horrible people do. In reality your own kids are just you so saying at
least he's OK to own kids is like saying as at least he's OK to is own
kids is like saying at least he's OK to himself, it's selfish evil
nonsense.
This happens especially among the most violently nasty elements in
British society, in gangster communities and in far right wing upper
class elites. Many of the upper classes have always believed that, it
justifies their abuses of the working classes, they could abuse, starve
and kill their inferiors as much as the liked but as they were OK to
their own kids and their own kind they were gentlemen.
He is exciting
That is the most horrific evil excuse. If someone walked up to me and
bullied me I'd be excited and very interested, but I'd hate the person
for doing it. I'd also hate the person for doing that to other people.
But pro evil people who get sexually aroused by snide bullies and
thugs, expect us to believe them when they see these as positive acts.
If they want excitement and interesting people there are such people
who don't like wrecking peoples lives. Why do they want to choose such
evil men? and taunt their victims by making their abusers win. They're
just evil people looking for evil excuses. If they get positive
emotions from abusing other people, or from other people who abuse
people then they're evil.
I bet to them they find the holocaust sexy, as they it is an exciting
event. They probably find SS soldiers who killed Jews really manly and
sexy for being evil.
People like that expect other people should get abused and have their
lives wrecked so they can get entertained thinking of how terrifying
and evil their evil partner is and how he can give her some kids who
inherit his horrible character.
He does things other men wouldn't do.
That's the whole problem he does evil nasty things that people
shouldn't do. Chopping someone's head off and cooking it in the oven
maybe a novelty but it's also really evil. You shouldn't be turned on
by them like some sort of kinky novelty act they're just evil. The
whole thing is that their evil abusive bullies who like wrecking
people's lives, while good people don't do that because they are good.
People who love bullies see being evil as positive characteristic to
pass down to their kids. It is just another way of supporting
bullying.
He is sexy for being evil
With nasty horrible bullies, being evil is actually the main basis for
sexual attraction, they don't realise this is merely an indication of
why they are evil.
Naught boys are fun
Like the NAZIS were more fun than the Jews in World War Two. Funny that
isn't it while the NAZIS gained their pleasure from abusing people the
victims seemed to be suffering from depression for some reason. It's
the same for bullies they bully their victims into being miserable and
then decide they are superior as they are having more fun than the
people whose lives they're wrecking. Bullies don't seem to work out the
basic notion they're more fun is because they are destroying other
peoples lives and gaining their pleasure by doing that. They shouldn't
gain pleasure wrecking other people's lives, that's one of the main
reasons they are evil.
I bet to them they find the holocaust sexy, as to them evil is fun in
fact they would probably find the SS the most amusing and funny people
in history.
He must have been through a lot of terrible things to be so angry, so I
am really maternalistic for caring about such a damaged man.
That has got to be to of the most nauseating defences of all. I got
bullied at school and university. The people who fancied these
apparently damaged men who bullied me, hated my guts as a weak sad
pathetic man who they wanted to kill himself. People who fancy bad boys
hate weak broken men and women they are not maternalistic people they
are ruthless horrible Nietzscheism people who hate victims with a
really sickening powerful psychopathic dehumanising hate. The first
time I noticed that bullies have amazing arrogant contempt for their
victims was really bemusing to me. I could barely understand how much
the bullies managed to combine hatred to abuse people powerfully with a
powerful dehumanising hated to their victims. Yet at the same time
we're supposed to accept that people who hate genuinely vulnerable
people who they would be prepared to bully to suicide are really
maternalistic people who fancy bullies because they want to help
damaged people. It's all a big crappy lie they are horrible people and
they just use this nonsensical argument as an excuse to try and pretend
they are good people. It is often done to con the bully himself. By
conning the bully into thinking she loves him for being damaged he gets
the impression she is a caring kind wonderful person so loves her, and
that she would be a good mother of his children, even though if he was
genuinely damaged she'd find him nauseating for being weak.
If they really want to help damaged people there are mentally ill
people, disabled people, pensioners, bullied people etc People who like
and support bullies hate vulnerable people, and the only reason they
fancy bullies is because they are pro evil people. They want more
people to suffer, they don't help the people who suffer.
I want to help him settle down.
That's just like the wanting to tame a bad boy just part of gloating
about how evil and terrifying the horrible man is, and boasting to
people about how nasty and horrible your partner, it's people who see
the nastiness as manly positive to pass down to kids.
He has that something extra
Yes the ability to be evil. Which is the whole problem. Why can't
people like that recognise being evil should be a negative not a
positive to wreck other people's lives. They see it like some sort of
kinky novelty act to inherit for their children and to scare people
with. Instead of realising their abuse wrecks peoples lives.
All people who liked bad boys are abused people
The vast majority of people who fancy bullies are confident snide
snobby bullies themselves, and the majority of the rest are people who
support bullying and deliberately make a choice of choosing a bully.
They are not broken people forced against they're will into staying
with nasty men. There nasty people who fancy bullies and enjoy abusing
people.
People who fancy bad boys are confident intelligent sophisticated
people
Then after lots of well meaning people think all people who fancy bad
boys are just broken down victims. A lot of horrible pro evil people
will stand up and say 'Well I'm a confident, intelligent person, I'm a
university educated person from a good family and I made my choice of a
bad boy as he is really exciting/dangerous/evil etc', as if that makes
loving bullies OK. All that does is show they are horrible people who
deliberately support and encourage men to bully and abuse people.
They're horrible ruthless bullying people who know what they're doing.
I couldn't care less what their background is. If anything the one's no
choice deserve sympathy but not some pro bullying person with an easy
life who gains pleasure from wrecking other people's lives.
I can choose who ever I want you sexist/mean person. In a post feminist
world people should be free to make their own choices. We don't live in
the nineteenth century.
Bullies are so evil that they think they should be free to wreck other
people's lives and make evil people win, when you complain about them
they think you're the one being unfair and mean.
Supporting evil people is nothing to do with equality, or feminism, or
modernity, it's simply Nietzscheism supporting evil people to win. The
bullies are the mean people for wanting to wreck people's lives. It
isn't progressive or feminist or modern or egalitarian to support
horrible people wrecking people's lives. It isn't equal rights.
I like a man who can stand up for himself
So you choose the most evil bullying psychopath you can. That is what I
hate people who like men who bully them because they want their kids to
inherit that nasty evil streak to win by being evil. People like that
are evil. They don't even mind being beaten by them.
I like a man with a bit of edge. A man who can fight. A man who can
stand up to me.
That is just more people who want children who bully and abuse other
people. These are the sort of people who enjoy being beaten by their
husbands because they see them as ruthless evil people so ruthless they
would abuse people who love them so this a massive positive skill for
their children. People like that are evil and just make evil men
win.
I am really forgiving
Absolute rubbish, it is just another of these pretend to be a nice
person excuse. If you really want to forgive someone for being evil it
doesn't mean giving birth to their children having sex with them loving
them and encouraging them to bully more
people. That is simply supporting and loving bullying.
Love is above everything
You can't do something evil and just say I loved doing it and think
that makes it acceptable. What other things can your pathetic argument
be used as a justification for, the holocaust, paedophilia, rape. If
some evil paedophile sexually abused children can the evil paedophile
say well I loved abusing the children and I loved them so that makes it
really romantic. You can't just love wrecking people lives or love
people who wreck other people's lives and think that love atones for
the fact you're evil, it makes it far far worse, that you love abusers
and abuse.
It is not romantic to love bullies it is simply evil, like paedophilia,
rape, murder.
Love is simply an emotion it is simply your emotional reaction to an
event or person. If you have positive emotional reaction to evil acts,
or evil people, because they wreck other people's lives you're
evil.
He is interesting
I bet to them they find the holocaust sexy, as it was an interesting
event in fact they would probably find the SS the most interesting so
therefore sexy people in history.
I want to make good from bad
Another pretend to be a nice person excuse. It is just someone who in
reality wants nasty descendents and wants to pretend they want good
descendents.
All men are bad
Loads of bullies do that to justify why they always choose nasty
men.
Bad men are sexually more energetic
That is rubbish. I have noticed evil people really believe that. There
basic logic seems to be that the more evil you are the more sexually
capable you are so that in their evil propaganda logic, a paedophile,
rapist, murdering, serial killer, bullying, aggressive thug, football
hooligan, devious, snide, ruthless, dictator who killed his own parents
for 10 pounds, and likes to torture people would be the most sexually
competent man in the world, and that all good men would be incapable.
It is nonsense that has no basis in truth, and is simply put about by
people who want to excuse why they always choose bad boys, the reality
is they want kids who bully people and don't like the idea of men who
are nice, as they could produce descendents who have the weakness of
being good, so they enjoy sex better with bullies and thugs because
they will have more chance of producing evil snide bullies.
If it really was true that evil people are more sexually better, then
Hitler would have been the most sexually energetic man in history, in
reality many historians argue he was impotent just like a lot of
bullies and thugs. Of course I realise some good people and bad people
are impotent but people have to watch out for the way that some really
nasty evil people confuse the fact they find evil people sexier and
therefore enjoy sex with evil people more, as a confusion for some
basic chemical characteristic that makes evil people sexier, all it is
is that the specific evil person fancies evil people.
They are sophisticated people who have emotions and desires other
people don't
No they don't they're psychopathic evil bullies who get pleasure from
abusing people, and so are you.
Good men are boring and bland
People who say that are horrible nasty bullies who only get their
pleasure abusing people and are therefore are evil. As they have an in
built sense of pleasure
that only gets pleasure abusing people.
I hate new men
It's the same as the previous one, where it is people who want to win
by being evil, want to have someone who can scare other people, want to
get their pleasure out of being a gang who bully people.
Good people are scary and creepy
Loads of bullies decide the people they bully are scary, as a way of
justifying why they are bullying them.
He's cool
Cool people are normally just the most snide bullying people who force
you to accept
they're superior to you. It's like at school where you end up with the
most sadistic evil bullies going into adult life thinking the reason
there were so many pro bullying people who fancied them was because
they were cool. Instead of the simple reason of people fancying evil
people because they want their descendents to be evil and win by being
evil.
He has personality
That is another term now used by bullies to say the more evil you are
the more of a personality you have so if you have.
12. IMPEDE PEOPLE WHO FANCY BAD BOYS FROM VOTING
If criminals can be banned from voting then so should people who fancy
bad boys. It is pretty obvious who such evil people will vote for.
Hitler's main voting block was people who found him sexy for being an
evil bad boy. We should ban people that fancy bad boys from voting as
they just vote for evil candidates like Le Pen, Hitler and other bad
boys who turn them on for being evil. The more evil and ruthless they
are the more they support them and regard them as manly sexy, leaders.
The more evil and ruthless and terrifying you are the more manly sexy
and authorative they see you as. They even see people who abuse them as
leaders. Why should we let such warped people vote. I don't want to
have my democracy ruined by some evil person turned on by bad
boys.
To them the holocaust was the funniest, manliest, exciting,
interesting, most erotic event in history. To tell you the truth I
think that people who fancy bad boys should be locked up for life as
they just make evil men win and encourage more men to be evil, they
taunt the bullies victims by making the bully win, they normally are
bullies, they like making their bullies victim's feel like scum and
they like to prattle on about how they think wrecking people's lives is
really sexy, great fun, exciting and manly. They support rapists,
bullies, racists, sexists, bigots, thugs and other evil men and then
pretend they are just being harmless, when they are in reality deeply
deeply evil people who cause more abuse and taunt the victims of their
evil lovers. The even hate their own sons if they turn out good as they
see that as effeminate and wimpish. If people can be banned from voting
for being criminals or for being insane, when we all know many of those
people might be innocent victims, then what on earth do we let people
that think Mike Tyson is sexy to vote for. I would prefer somebody with
a severe learning disability or someone who forget to pay their TV
licence on time to be aloud to vote rather than some evil scum bag who
finds Mike Tyson raping someone sexy getting to vote. It scares me
thinking what level of evil they would vote for. There are loads of
people in the telegraph who have written columns boasting of their
sexual attraction to really evil men such as Mike Tyson, Eminem, what
sort of men would they be prepared to vote for they must be the sort of
people who voted for the alleged rapist and alleged Neo-NAZI Alan Clark
on the basis they found him sexy, and manly for committing evil. It is
obvious they were the sort of people in France who preferred the
adulteress, Neo-NAZI, evil Le Pen over Jospin on the basis they found
Le Pen sexy, manly and exciting for being evil and thought Jospin was
boring for being good.
I bet if you go to those council seats were the BNP won most of them
will be full of women who get turned on by bad boys and want more
abusers. You know the type laughs that bad boys or naughty boys are
more fun because their main source of pleasure is watching their
boyfriend wreck people's lives. I bet that is what Le Pen's wife
fantasises about she probably fantasies about Le Pen torturing Algerian
prisoners and she gets sexually aroused thinking how her children will
inherit her husbands evil powers.
Lets face it we all know who those people who support Mike Tyson would
vote for if given the choice between a candidate who supports rape,
sexual abuse, bullying other evil versus a good in their eyes boring
candidate who wants everyone to be nice. They'd vote for Mr evil bad
boy. I say we should ban pro evil people like that from voting they
think they're really funny, sophisticated, whimsical, original and care
free jokers but they are actually complete piles of shit who corrupt
the democratic system by deliberately voting for evil candidates.
Why on earth should we allow people who fancy bullies, rapists, thugs,
to vote, they just vote for evil people and mess up the democratic
elections by lumbering us with really really evil candidates. If you
think it is feminist or standing up for women to stand up for people
like that then I am sure you would find many people in the NAZI
movement who would agree for your warped version of feminism. They
would probably vote for a rapist given half a chance. They say people
who fancy bad people even love men who beat them, as they want their
kids to inherit the ability to be evil from such men, well what is the
equivalent of that in a democratic state, they would probably vote for
someone wanting a military dictatorship who locks people up and
electrocutes people even people who support him.
I think if criminals, insane people, and debtors can be banned from
voting then so should people who fancy bad boys, as it's obvious what
sort of evil society they want to develop. At least many of the insane
people want might some harmless eccentric idealistic things. Some of
the criminals will be evil like rapists, bullies, and thugs, although
we all know some criminals are victims who many be idealistic and good,
but the fact is that people who fancy bullies will just be off the
scale in what they vote for, they deliberately want people to be abused
and have their lives destroyed because they get sexually aroused by
evil men. It is pretty obvious what sort of people they would vote
for.
I am sick and tired of the way Jospin was blamed for that fact French
voted him out on the basis they found him boring for being good. I say
people who reject candidates for being too nice shouldn't be aloud to
vote if they want to subject us to some sort of hell they should be
banned from voting.
13. ESTROGEN MAKES PEOPLE MORE VIOLENT
Women with higher estrogen levels (the female sex hormone) tend to be
more aggressive and violent, than women with lower estrogen levels. I
think this is because hormones make people stronger and strogner people
tend to abuse the weak. The same seems to be true of testosterone. I
think people have tried to pretend these chemicals have a direct
psychologcial affect on people as part of ideology to promote the idea
it is manly to be violent when in reality modern evidence is proving
that neither chemical has a direct psychological repsonse it is just
tha stronger people tend to be more likely to exploit their strength.
Some evil idiots think Mike Tyson became a bullying rapist becaue of
testosterone levels. Lennox Lewis's victory has proved that idea wrong.
Loads of hoolignas call themselves testosterone packed for beating
people up. When in reality testosterone has no affect directly on
personality. Most soldiers will have higher than average testosterone
levels as to get in the army you need to be above average in terms of
strength. for women and men.
14. REAL MEN - WHY I HATE REAL MEN
Real man culture is just part of an evil ideas that has been around for
centuries that it is manly or sexy to abuse people. If not evil then
violent, but normally both. Men and women who support violence and
abuse have always put forward this evil idea. People who find abusers
and bad people sexy pretend it is whimsical to support abuse when in
reality it is just evil.
