Carl MacDougall (1996) The Casanova Papers

I’m a duff reviewer. The narrator is a former Glasgow journalist trying to make sense of his life after his wife dies, but I don’t know his name. I’m not sure he has a name. Let’s call him everyman adrift. His background is on the page. And I like to play detective and mitch and match with the author.

She was a second-year student and I was her tutor; a disgraceful state of affairs, as popular then as now. I was attracted by the difference. My own background was poorly genteel, with Scottish qualities of hard work, thrift and hypocrisy. She was an Edinburgh girl away from home.

The recognition of hypocrisy is what makes a writer. We’re all at it. But some of us don’t care to look. Others look the other way and distance themselves and blame others. I do that too. But at least I know, or think I know.

What keeps the writers sane after the death of his wife is his work –and an affair with AnnA in Paris. The former journalist has nicked papers, diaries and journals related to Giacomo Casanova de Signault from a former Nazi sympathiser during the Second World War. Most everybody knows who Casanova is, but hardly anybody knows what he was really like. The former journalist has the jigsaw of Casanova’s handcopied edition of My Life in front of his as well as reports from courtiers and spies. As the narrator puts together the jigsaw of Casanova’s life he hopes to put his own life in order.

Two stories running in tandem. One then. One now. I liked the nitty-gritty of leeches being applied for almost any illness and Casanova saving someone from certain death by taking a mercury poultice from the man’s chest. Some patients paid for their medicine by offering their hair and teeth in advance payment.  I’ve heard of an arm and leg (also convertible currency) but that takes the biscuit. My preference was the Glasgow stories, the narrator running after his daughter, his beautiful daughter, who turned out to be a junkie and disappeared. Common humanity is often muck, but that’s where things grow. Read on.   

Comments

A 'disgraceful man'. When I was a student I am sure many of the staff and students had 'intentions' but AFAIK they kept sensible by not acting upon them. This saved the staff from getting fired for 'gross moral turpitude' and saved the students from being 'taken advantage of.' I'm being serious. When I had completed my final year project I had steamy fantasies of rolling around in the heathery hills with my supervisor and his wife. It wouldn't have worked.

I plan to read this book.

 

While at Paisley College I remember one lecturer sleeping with a student ever year. Ian Watt. He always picked the pretty ones. I thought he was a baldy wanker. But I was jealous. Ian Watt's trick was to split up with the student at exam time. He didn't want to be accused of helping or inflluencing her.