scissor anyone?

13 posts / 0 new
Last post
scissor anyone?

I've been thinking about pairs. you can't have a single scissor or, for that matter a single trouser so why do we have to refer to them as a pair when they are one object made of several pieces?
You could argue that there was once a single trouser of some kind that covered one leg, in the same way that a pair of glasses is so called because originally there was a single eye glass but scissors are, by definition, made of two moving parts. The act of 'scissoring' can't be done with a single piece so why is it called a pair if you can't have just one?

Hox
Anonymous's picture
Bough Cough Dough Lough Rough Sough Tough Who decided ?
e-griff
Anonymous's picture
welsh say 'a scissor' , trouser, etc. ask a welsh person for explication. G
iceman
Anonymous's picture
Probably from Old English or Middle English derivation Hox, thats my wild guess :)
mississippi
Anonymous's picture
Trouser press. Scissor action.
janeymack
Anonymous's picture
you could have one trouser if you only had one leg
Tom Saunders
Anonymous's picture
and a pant
Stephen Gardiner
Anonymous's picture
to wear over your brief
mississippi
Anonymous's picture
covering your ball
freda
Anonymous's picture
hard to keep abreast of it
Matt
Anonymous's picture
Tried to explain this today to ESOL students Ely, why do we say 'some' trousers, when it is a single item of clothing... I couldn't explain it, changed the subject. Time to refer to the grammar books I reckon.
Stephen Gardiner
Anonymous's picture
And why doesn't "anathema" take an article, direct or indirect? What's the plural of entropy and does the word onomatopoeia sound like anything? Back to the barrel.
Stephen Gardiner
Anonymous's picture
And why doesn't "anathema" take an article, direct or indirect? What's the plural of entropy and does the word onomatopoeia sound like anything? Back to the barrel.
Topic locked