scissor anyone?
Wed, 2002-07-17 10:24
#1
scissor anyone?
I've been thinking about pairs. you can't have a single scissor or, for that matter a single trouser so why do we have to refer to them as a pair when they are one object made of several pieces?
You could argue that there was once a single trouser of some kind that covered one leg, in the same way that a pair of glasses is so called because originally there was a single eye glass but scissors are, by definition, made of two moving parts. The act of 'scissoring' can't be done with a single piece so why is it called a pair if you can't have just one?
Bough
Cough
Dough
Lough
Rough
Sough
Tough
Who decided ?
welsh say 'a scissor' , trouser, etc. ask a welsh person for explication. G
Probably from Old English or Middle English derivation Hox, thats my wild guess :)
Trouser press.
Scissor action.
you could have one trouser if you only had one leg
and a pant
to wear over your brief
covering your ball
hard to keep abreast of it
Tried to explain this today to ESOL students Ely, why do we say 'some' trousers, when it is a single item of clothing...
I couldn't explain it, changed the subject. Time to refer to the grammar books I reckon.
And why doesn't "anathema" take an article, direct or indirect?
What's the plural of entropy and does the word onomatopoeia sound like anything?
Back to the barrel.
And why doesn't "anathema" take an article, direct or indirect?
What's the plural of entropy and does the word onomatopoeia sound like anything?
Back to the barrel.