Duds

Some time ago I was reading a Dutch literary website which ran a sort of competition.  Readers were invited to report on books which they had started, but never finished.  The winner with the most votes (if you can call it that) was Donna Tartt's The Little Friend.

So I thought it would be interesting to ask the ABC folk to submit their entries, and see if there are any regular offenders.  It would have to be a book which you started, and never finished by choice.  Your reasons would be interesting too. 

Here's my list.  It's certainly not exhaustive, there are many more.  But I don't want you to start this blog and not finish it by choice smiley

  1. Donna Tartt The Little Friend.  Yep me too.  Starts off well as a gripping thriller but just meanders about with long sections which contribute nothing whatsoever to plot or character development.
  2. John Updike Rabbit novels.  I did plough through the first one on the basis that he is so famous I ought to like him, but it was hard work.  I started the second, but I had the same problem – I so intensely disliked every single character that I didn't care what happened to them. There wasn't one single person I was rooting for.  Once that's happened, you start thinking life is only so long why should I spend it finding out what happens to a bunch of obnoxious people ?  So I gave up.  (I have exactly the same problem with F Scott Fitzgerald.
  3. John Williams Stoner. One of those 'rediscovered masterpieces' which was being raved about here in the UK around 2013 (it was written in 1965).  It was just so damned depressing, I was losing the will to live.
  4. David Guterson Snow Falling on Cedars.  This is a very famous book.  I found it well written with a really gripping story.  What put the kybosh on it for me was the flashbacks.  The story gets going and it really pulls you in – was it an accident ?  Was it murder and if so who dun it ?  Does racism and the recent history of WW2 play a part ? Every time the story gets going, the momentum is completely lost as Guterson screeches to a halt and dives into a long back story about one of the major characters.  Then you get going again on the main story, only for the same annoying thing to happen. Again and again.  Eventually I gave up and flicked to the end to find out what happened.  Which actually was interesting and clever.  A good novel, spoilt by its format in my opinion.
  5. Maggie O'Farrell Hamnet.  Very topical. I tried reading this twice, because it kept coming into the charity shop where I do the books, so I could see it was popular.  Interesting true and very sad story, which I knew from seeing Kenneth Branagh and Judi Dench in All Is True. I just found the style of the book too pretentious and tricksy.  I thought O'Farrell was showing off and found that unbearably irritating. 

Comments

ah, I'd need to think about that. I finished Donna Tartt's The Little Friend, watched the movie (not bad) wrote a review. Like most things, can't remember if it's Monday or Sunday so don't ask. Liked The Secret History but not too much. Loved The Goldfinch. 

John Updike, tried reading one of his books...

War and Peace...finished it and was awarded the grand cross of crossing over. The winsome beauty became a fat slobber and stalker, Cities burned but that was my take. 

Shakespeare. Phew. I know. Contributed so many neologisms, plots, all the usual stuff. Boring as fuck. I've got the giganticallistic book of all his plays with commentaries. My favourite was Homer Simpson's verson of Hamlet. Eat your heart out Mel Gibson. (eat your heart was probably coined by Shakespeare). Fuck. 

The Old Testament. No wonder Jesus wept. I'd refer to our friend Homer Simpson here too. 

Maggie O'Farrell. I loved her memoir. I Am, I Am, I Am, 17 Brushes with Death. Couldn't get past the first few pages of Hamnet. Gave up, twice. 

Hilitary Mantell, Wolf Hall. Similiar to Hamnet. Yet here's the rub (no doubt coined by Shakespeare) I loved the BBC production. I watched all episodes. 

Charles Dickens good on telly. Not so good to read. Boring. 

J.K.Rowling. Harry Potter is great on the telly. I understand why kids loved it and lots of British actors got paid stacks of money for putting on a pointy hat. Her adult detective series...pish. 

Frank O'Connor, celebrated Irish short-story writer. But only if you've not read them. 

Anton Chekov's plays and short stories. The Cherry Orchard. The Lady and the Dog. Frequently referenced for it's...alrightish. Not sure what the fuss was. Read it several times. Can't crack the code. 

George Saunders. I've read all his books. Not liked any. 

Irvine Welsh. Kinda the same. Started with Trainspotting. Early novels...

Margaret Atwood, The Handmaid's Tale. Obviously precient. But a bit boring.

Stephen King. I snacked on most of his big books in the seventies and eighties. Then he became more miss than hit. Or maybe I grew older. I'd like to say wiser. The kind of reader that can quote Shakepearian text and reference the Iliad. Eh, no. 

There are many others I could add. I just can't think of them now. Anything with an upperclass idea of forgotten glamour like Bridehead Revisted. I visited the first time. Never again.    

 

Thanks Jack, interesting list.  I'm with you on Dickens, very overrated.  He'll never catch on.

 

If you think he's overrated, you should not read his good friend, Wilkie Collins. 

 

Oh I'm a big Wilkie Collins fan !  I do like a Sensation Novel.

I loved The Evil Genius, which was a sympathetic portrait of a married man having an affair with his daughter's governess, and then abandoning his family and running off with her. Once I found out about Collins' extremely unconventional private life I wasn't surprised he wrote it, just surprised that he managed to get it published in Victorian England. I liked the way he showed the husband falling for the girl out of pity, because he'd rescued her from a terrible life, and she fell in love with him out of gratitude for the same reason.  Of course, Collins had to show that immorality didn't pay in the end, like Vanity Fair or East Lynn, but I thought it was a good attempt at showing human frailty and not making all the characters plain old good or bad.

I also liked The Law and The Lady.  That was the first I knew about Scotland have an 'Not Proven' verdict in court.  The difference between English and Scottish law also played a large part in the plot of The Evil Genius.

 

Hey yoooooo!

I'll be passing through England in January. If I send you some money could you send a couple of your books to my thirdborn's house in Stockport?

I don't do Amazon.

Turlough

but there are so many! Which ones do you want?

Am I on commission ?

 

How about the two that you've got the most copies of, plus the one that you consider to be your best?

Turlough

e-mail the details (just use the abctales mail thingy)
It's all very eclectic. My best is definitely Gibbous House, but equally definitely it's not one for Dickens Agnostics.

https://www.goodreads.com/work/editions/44688956-gibbous-house

Ewan you know that isn't true smiley  I have looked up your books on Amazon and people love them.

 

... but most of them are people I know!!

That's exactly what Fyodor Dostoevsky said... possibly.

Turlough

Come on now, you're being modest Ewan.  You mum didn't post 61 reviews.  Did she ?

 

I suspect my mum had Gibbous House down as one of her own Duds.It is quite long after all. I dedicated the book to my Dad, but I doubt he ever knew, as by the time it was published by Unbound, he was in the grip of dementia.

Oh I'm sorry, but his name will be in that book for ever, even if he doesn't know. That's a lovely thing to do.

 

It’s difficult to buy English language books where I live so I tend to just buy and read what I find available rather than what people have recommended. And most of the books I read tend to be second hand ones picked up at village bazars at home or charity shops in Ireland and England. So I don’t mind picking up a book where there’s a risk of me not liking it because, generally speaking, I won’t have paid very much money for it. As I get older this is something that has become more and more important to me as my attention span decreases and I find that if I’m not totally immersed in a book by the end of the first hundred pages, I never finish it. It goes on the dud pile and eventually back to the second-hand booksellers.

It hasn’t always been like that though and I have in the past struggled on through some books that I haven’t enjoyed and I have put one or two back on my shelf with a mental note to try them again later. I will read all of James Joyce’s work before I die!

The greatest dud of all, and by a million miles, is Lord of the Rings by the boy Tolkien. Around forty years ago I read all but the last eighty pages of it. Some chapters I read twice as their contents hadn’t grabbed my attention and I’d gone off in a daydream as my eyes simply went through the motions of scanning over the words on the pages. On more than one occasion I asked myself “Why am I reading this? It’s complete and utter nonsense,” Then one morning as I was travelling to work on the bus I was finding it harder than ever so as the bus approached my stop I got up from my seat, rang the bell to alert the driver and stood by the door waiting to arrive and hop off. It was during that wait that I noticed the used ticket bin was marginally bigger than the book, so I dropped it in. Seeing it fit so snugly I had a great feeling of delight. It’s probably still there today going round and round Leeds Ring Road on a single decker number nine.

No other dud has ever come near to that but there have been others.

I really enjoyed Stephen King’s first two books and loved his third ‘The Shining’. I probably read three or four more that followed these but gradually noticed that their characters were all very similar and the plots might have easily merged into one. So after a promising start, he tailed right off and I gave up on him. To me he was the Elton John of literature.

I was promised that I would love Bill Bryson’s travel books. I bought three all at the same time and read one and a half of them. Instead of thinking ‘great writer’ I just thought ‘smartarse’ whenever I tried to read them.

Shakespeare. The whole world has told me how brilliant his writing is but I find it totally boring and seeing his plays performed on stage is even worse because in the theatre you can’t just wander away and put the kettle on (apparently) and you also have to listen to all the other theatregoers doing all their pretentious analysis. Shakespeare’s work, I admit, is very clever, but so is Faraday's Law of Electromagnetic Induction.

For a long time I used to think I hated poetry but eventually discovered that I only hated the stuff they rammed down our throats at school. I wasn’t even interested enough to remember the names of their poets. I really enjoy some poetry now, but there’s still a huge mountain of it that I can’t get on with.

But going back to Tolkien, I’m grateful to him because he made me realise that I never enjoy books (or films) about something that couldn’t possibly have happened in real life. In this I include fantasy, horror, science fiction, religion and Eastenders.

I’ve been reading books for sixty years but I’ve written this in ten minutes, so I’m sure there’ll be something to add to it every day after today.

Turlough

Well don't tell any of the professional authors on here, but I only buy new books as presents for other people.  I get the books for me to read either from the charity shop where I work, or the library where I work.  So as you say, there's no financial pain if I decide to bail early.

I do find, like you, that my attention span has reduced, but I think that's just time breathing down my neck.  Conscious of it rapidly running out, I'm not inclined to spend what little I have left ploughing through literary treacle.

Have you ever read Bored of the Rings ?  Honest, it's a real book,  Arrowroot, son of Arrowshirt was my favourite character.  Sounds like you might have enjoyed that more.  

 

Back in about 1975, I think. More elder brother gave me a copy. Hilariously funny.

Actually my favourite character was the parody of Bilbo.  But his name was so rude I can't possibly put it on here.

 

I actually loved Lord of the Rings. I read the whole book in one go when I was 10 or 11. It took me 3 years. I was quite backward then and never caught up on on. 

George RR Martin. Now there is a dud. 

 

I read Lord of the Rings when I was 17 and I loved it. I found it a totally credible explanation of our past Earth history, far more credible than the bible. But of course I couldn't say that at the convent.

I tried watching Game of Thrones on tv because everyone was talking about it, but I only managed one and a half episodes.  Definitely one of my tv duds.  I gave up because :

  1. Too much effing.  I'm quite old fashioned like that.  I use it myself when circumstances demand, but I don't drop in every sentence like the Americans seem to on tv and film. I still count it as really bad swearing.
  2. Too much gratuitous female nudity (ie not enough gratuitous male nudity)
  3. Too many characters.  Bloody millions of them !  No wonder people published books to explain it all.