"It would seem that the management have little concern that various people are being driven away and deprived of their opportunity to publish work and learn from others. To that end, I would argue that the site is not fulfillinfg its primary function."
Is the fulfilling it's primary function?
Obviously but I fail to see any logic in the rest of your point.
What possible benefit is 'the management' deriving from the present state of the site?
Do you have a hilarious conspiracy theory? It might cheer us up? It would certainly be more fun than the reality?
That should be:
'Is the site fulfilling its primary function?'
A missed word and a misplaced apostrophe. Very poor.
On the more minor issue. I think the problem, Ralph, may be partly to do with your addiction to attention seeking stunts such as this thread.
Alison my angel.
You can do way better than that and you know it. Are you responsible for the collectoive thing with Bert. I do hope not.
Anyway, how is the nappy rash these days?
Chin chin
xx
ooops i realise i have made a grave error ... and in joke ... for those of you who dont know what on earth i am talking about ... iceman came to an abc meeting and got drunk and puked in my toilet and i had to forcibly eject him into a cab ...
that night also stormy petrel fell into my clematis ...
i do apologise ... i am a great fan of social inclusion ...
as for the collective ... it's crystal clear from the email addy isnt it?
Pages