Are we living in the past?

73 posts / 0 new
Last post
Lisa
Anonymous's picture
The GRRREATEST bloke on the planet!
Lisa
Anonymous's picture
John- lol - you win!!
John
Anonymous's picture
*Smiles* Do you arm wrestle by any Chance. No don't answer that.
Lisa
Anonymous's picture
*
John
Anonymous's picture
Grrrrrrrrrr! Stop it!!!
Lisa
Anonymous's picture
I do a pretty good right leg wrestle!
Lisa
Anonymous's picture
Oooh look. We both posted at exactly the same time! No need for lastword.com now!
John
Anonymous's picture
That explains to slimy Octopus. Can picture you doing it! *Stands up and tries it out*
Lisa
Anonymous's picture
You can't do it on your own! It's a foot against foot horizontal thingy!
John
Anonymous's picture
Well I ant got another foot. So this will just have to. *Feels silly for the previous Octopus dance*
Lisa
Anonymous's picture
It's ok! I enjoyed it anyway! But I'm sure octopuses/octopi/octopusses (never had to write about more than one) dance better together!
Smiley
Anonymous's picture
Seems that several types of octopus (octopii?) have mastered walking on just two tentacles so even though we only have two legs would should be able to manage some of their dances.
Smiley
Anonymous's picture
By the way Jasper - Grrrrrrrrrr is a great fan of u ;o)
Radiodenver
Anonymous's picture
I suppose next, you'll be lighting up cigarettes?
Smiley
Anonymous's picture
I take it that you mean John and Lisa, Denver.
Flash
Anonymous's picture
I predict that you will make a lot of Womens head's hurt with that question Poliko. And i predict i might gain a sore jaw if i don't scarper off to work sharpish.
deepthinker
Anonymous's picture
well I have heard it said that we just don't exist! We are not in the past because that's gone. We are not in the future because that hasn't happened And we are not in the present because as soon as it happens it is has past. SO there you go.
Debashish Haar
Anonymous's picture
deepthinker
Anonymous's picture
Yes that's exactly what I was talking about. Although I think 2x squared in the fifth equation should be substituted with pi multiplied by the square route of 314.1 to the power of ten. Other than that, they are spot on!
Jasper...not Zo...
Anonymous's picture
Every letter I am writing now, was the past before it became my present, but only after I reflect upon it in future! Therefore I'm predicting my own future into the readers past! So what I thought I though before I thought it, is the future....... (Premise: I am just thinking about thinking about thinking)! And as I can think about thinking, I can exist only within a thought about thinking.........therefore I am still predicting I am(subjective), not are(objective)! Consciousness is it's own and only witness.....Descate, you twit...you forgot to carry the damn reflection of light factor again? I now predict my brain is about to implode, as to explode requires past, present, and future, space/ time......one of which I won't be in at some point soon to further witness (objective perdiction about my own objective matter of matter)! Jasper then spins and shoots the other leg off his French looking monkey with a Gote, who just tried running off with all the frozen Banana Custard from the fridge......how predictable! But then as "INTENT" is always 'ACTIVE'........a group of passing passive monkeys in preistly robes start farting in Jasper's general direction! Zoro then springs into action wearing a see-through lycra G-string and balaclava, wildly rubbing two sticks together while standing on one leg! Well, I think they're sticks.......sniff sniff..........errrrrrhhhhh........ dirty Pink Flamingo.........put down those two dead Marxist monkeys?
Smiley
Anonymous's picture
I seem to remember that your point was considered and examined in a Buddhist sutra several hundred years before Christ, Deep Thinker, but my Bhuddist theory is very rusty and I can't remember which - was it the Diamond?
1legspider
Anonymous's picture
A waterfall is a waterfall, if you freeze it in time, it ceases to be a waterfall and becomes frozen water. 'I' or conciousness is not a state, but a process, it is not useful to think of it as existing in a static past, present, future I find, but rather as an ongoing process that happens in time. All we can usefuly say in the end is that it straddles a portion of what we call time, and as time is a building block of the universe, then 'I' will always feature in the detail of this particular universe. So in a sense, once we exist, we will always exist in time and hence in the universe. Is that not comforting? Does that make sense? Am not sure I am explaining what I mean properly.

Pages

Topic locked