Let's have a moan about the new ABC short story competition
I feel like having a moan about the new ABC short story competition. What bugs me is that after the feedback we gave on the last one (and it wasn't just me) they seem to have made the same two basic mistakes again. The first one is the word length: 1000 words is too short for an ordinary story where there is characterisation and plot development and dialogue and all the rest of it. It's in the realm of "super-shorts", what the Americans call "flash fiction", it's a very particular technique and a minority interest among short story writers. The second basic mistake is the narrow and uninspiring theme "the office". Okay, we can interpret it a bit (I suppose you could write about "the office of President") but basically the phrase is a big turn-off, as was the number twenty in the first competition. The aim seems to be to set up hoops that people either will or won't be able to jump through, certainly not to inspire or excite. The received wisdom is that the last competition was a great success and produced lots of first class writing: personally I don't go along with that analysis. I think it produced a few competent pieces but nothing in the least outstanding, and I most certainly include my own entry in that comment. What do the rest of you feel? Finally, the prize. Well, let's be honest, you can go along to BBC recording sessions for nothing if you write in, and although I admire Ricky Gervais' work I don't know if I will be free on the evening in question, and would feel a bit strange going along on my own. Isn't two tickets the traditional number? Also, what if I live in Nottingham, or Tampa for that matter? Come on, let's all have a good moan.