On the Celebrity of Writing These Days.

33 posts / 0 new
Last post
On the Celebrity of Writing These Days.

Are we losing our writing ability?

And, if we are, does it matter? In the days when Pamela Anderson, OJ Simpson, and Paris Hilton can have a book on the shelves of your local shop faster than your head can spin, do you need to be able to write to be a writer? - OK, maybe not OJ.

Most British soccer players have a book out. Alright, it's a book about themselves, not necessarily one you'd want to read, but it's a book and it's in the shops with a glossy cover.

And if the book has enough high resolution photos in it there may not be much reading to be done anyway. And I like looking at glossy photographs as much as the next man. (Maybe not photographs of footballers, granted, but I do like photos.)

So, perhaps if we replace text with images and sense with celebrity we'll be doing ourselves all a favour. Why read when you can look? As the famous sayings go: No camera is mendacious. And a word's thousand pictures of worth.

Why write when you can simply look?

Celebrity books are ghost written and if that's what sells, who am I to object, its not as if good literature is edged out by this kind of thing. Even less so with online bookshops...there is no limit to the number of titles sitting on a virtual bookshelf. I used to sneer at this kind of thing but as I'm getting a little bit nicer in my old age I am realising that 'live and let live' is a good motto to live by. Who am I to say what people should and shouldn't eat, wear and indeed read. And I myself recently had a flick through a celebrity photobook about Oasis so I am hardly adhering to a high intellectual bar. but that doesn't really address your question 'do you need to be able to write to be a writer?' I would say 'yes' but you do not have to be a writer to produce a book. Photo books have been around for a long time and before that books with colour plates or woodcut prints or other visual art. Paper and therefore books are not the exclusive reserve of the written word nor should they be. jude "Cacoethes scribendi" http://www.judesworld.net

 

You need to be able to write to be a writer. You need to be able to write well to be a good writer. It's not rocket science.

 

on a slight tangent, apparently poor old Jane Austen would have problems finding a publisher today: http://books.guardian.co.uk/news/articles/0,,2129738,00.html

 

Reference the Guardian Books link: thank you for a sorely needed laugh. I note several publishers claimed their internal communications showed they knew they'd been 'Orsoned' (F for Fake): Well, they would say that, wouldn't they? Never underestimate the power of fools in large groups. graffito in bar outside US Air Base in Turkey
Er, with high-street bookshops charging up to 45,000 to place one book in their shops good literature is squeeze out! It certainly is! lol http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/06/19/nbooks31... I say lets have more boobs and tittle-tattle in our bookshops. There's never enough room for boobs. My webpage is at: http://www.bookscape.co.uk
a bookshop will order any title you ask them to order. Amazon, ABE will probably stock it anyway. If you want to browse without anything specific in mind, Oxfam and other second hand bookshops are brilliant and cheap. Foyles is a very good independent bookstore and even the chains like borders on the Charing Cross road are well stocked. That your average suburban town's Waterstones is a bit limited is nothing new. jude "Cacoethes scribendi" http://www.judesworld.net

 

Still an awful lot more space devoted to literary fiction in my local waterstones (Staines, harldy a cultural hub) than there is to celebrity biography.

 

I say let the market run free. Lets explore the possibilities of total commerce, and have live erotic displays in bookshop windows. I don't think 45,000 pounds per book is enough to charge personally. I think Waterstones should double that price. And on the subject of writing: Why restrict writing to the use of words? Because a growing number of modern writers can't write: Let's include hand prints, thumb prints and the potato cuttings that we did in primary school in the definition of modern writing. (To go along with the picture books.) My webpage is at: http://www.bookscape.co.uk
Ever the iconoclast! Never underestimate the power of fools in large groups. graffito in bar outside US Air Base in Turkey
Never underestimate the power of fools in large groups. I saw it the first time. And how deeply true it is. My webpage is at: http://www.bookscape.co.uk
Incidentally Patmac, have you read the House of Leaves by Mark Z Danielewicz? Never underestimate the power of fools in large groups. graffito in bar outside US Air Base in Turkey
Ewan, No. I hadn't heard of it until now. Why do you ask? It sounds excellent, by the way. (Mark Z Danielewski) Incidentally the book is here: http://www.amazon.com/House-Leaves-Mark-Z-Danielewski/dp/0375703764 My webpage is at: http://www.bookscape.co.uk
House of Leaves is a lunatic experiment in mad typography, deconstructionist novel writing and horror: unless I completely misunderstood it when I read it. It made me think about what writing and books are. Maybe the title is a clue... maybe a book is a House of Leaves BTW the graffito is my signature on the comment form, so I've removed it from this one. Ewan
'Let's include hand prints, thumb prints and the potato cuttings that we did in primary school in the definition of modern writing'. No...it would go into the definition of modern art. I think you've completely missed the distinction between 'books' and 'writing'. This was an excellent project championed by Sir John Bird and ABCTales ran a competition to include some writing alongside the photographs but essentially it remains a piece of visual art garnished with writing... http://www.amazon.co.uk/London-at-Dawn-Anthony-Epes/dp/1843580756/ref=sr... and yes, I saw a copy on the shelf in Oxford Street's Waterstones! Harbouring a resentment against the publishing and book selling industry does you no favours. jude "Cacoethes scribendi" http://www.judesworld.net

 

... and I would add that there has always been pretty dire writing around. Enid Blyton? Or how about this classic "It was a dark and stormy night; the rain fell in torrents--except at occasional intervals, when it was checked by a violent gust of wind which swept up the streets (for it is in London that our scene lies), rattling along the housetops, and fiercely agitating the scanty flame of the lamps that struggled against the darkness." jude "Cacoethes scribendi" http://www.judesworld.net

 

I haven't missed any distinctions. I'm saying since so many modern writers can't write... Let's introduce finger painting and potato cutting into literature to make it easier for all of the people who can't write. My webpage is at: http://www.bookscape.co.uk
PoetJude I'd thank you to keep your comments on the subject of literature and not on the subject of me. You don't know me. And you have absolutely no idea what my preferences are. My webpage is at: http://www.bookscape.co.uk
PoetJude I'd thank you to keep your comments on the subject of literature and not on the subject of me. You don't know me. And you have absolutely no idea what my preferences are. My webpage is at: http://www.bookscape.co.uk
What do you mean by literature? My mother tongue is not English so no doubt, I will make awful mistakes in writing. I feel literature very much relates to time and style…for example: Bob Dylan lyrics are not all that proper English Language. I’m only suggesting, I could be wrong…I like to hear some definition.

 

Windrose, I'm wondering if we could open literature up to include shapes and symbols. But to be honest that would require a detailed debate on literary aesthetics which goes well beyond the scope of a forum thread. In the time and space allowed in a forum thread, all I can constructively say is: In an age where being able to write is no longer considered necessary for writing books, why don't we add lots more things to our books which don't require words? My webpage is at: http://www.bookscape.co.uk
True. Even images of a single video song got a whole lot of items in it.

 

"I say let the market run free. Lets explore the possibilities of total commerce, and have live erotic displays in bookshop windows." Wouldn't work from a commercial point of view. Lots of people would be offended and others would just stand outside the shop looking in rather than coming in to buy books.

 

Well, Ewan, thanks. I'll track down a copy. I've been making some enquiries ever since you told me about it. I'll try harder! lol & let you know how I got on with it. Kind regards, Pat My webpage is at: http://www.bookscape.co.uk
Firstly, let me just attempt to correct the over-italicization... Hmm, it didn't seem to work... help?? :-/ Well anyway... Jude... I like how Zen you seem to be these days! "Live and let live" & all that... There is much in life that it is probably quite pointless to moan about - or at least, if one must moan, one ought to do so in a jocular and laissez faire fashion! :) On the subject of literature, books and whatnot... Well, my girlfriend is a photographer, whose work I love, and since she has got into the image-making game, I have a far deeper respect for this particular area of artistic endeavour. An picture can say more than a thousand, ten thousand, a million words - in fact, often words say far more than "needs" to be said. So I would be the last one to, generally speaking, have bad things to say about books full of pictures! As far literature/quality thereof/the Jane Austen thing is concerned... I think it very much serves to demonstrate the subjective nature of literary "quality." Fashion has always played a large part in what (in literature, art or whatever) is deeme "quality." It could perhaps be true to say that, these days, the likes of cinema and (going out on a bit of a limb here) videogames are areas in which dichotomies of opinions regarding "quality" are most visibly evident. Was "The Matrix" (for the sake of argument, the first film)... (A) a multi-layered work of post-modernist genius? ...or... (B) utter shite? Feel free to replace the above question with any number of versions of such relating to particular "pop culture" examples. There are those who would say that quality is quality, regardless of what any number of opinionists (?) may opine. I would challenge such a person to clarify such an assertion by providing a detailed definition of what (in this particular case, in respect of "literature") constitutes "quality"! pe ps oid Blogs! "the art of tea" "that's an odd courgette"

The All New Pepsoid the Second!

Enzo v2.0
Anonymous's picture
Just a post to sort the italics...
Hurrah! :) pe ps oid Blogs! "the art of tea" "that's an odd courgette"

The All New Pepsoid the Second!

OOPS! Italics were my fault glad you fixed it Enzo 2.0! Yes, well, fashion is important regarding tastes: Austen of course is out of fashion: however I would imagine the irony with which she writes will return her to favour many times. Equally, it is no surprise that writers like these are often plundered by Hollywood (Clueless, anyone?)as quality is still quality. I am sure Bulwer-Lytton was recognised as tosh on publication. (Still in print I believe,however). The Matrix? hmmm.... Philosophical trappings on a shoot-em-up... the film would have been a better game than the tie-in. I come down on the side of shite...... But then, that's just opinion :-) Ewan
My vague understanding is that Edward Bulwer Lytton was right in the middle of the action where early 19th C literature was concerned. I know that he was much published by the hugely influential publisher Henry Colburn, (who published Lord Byron and Disraeli.) I've been trying to find out whether or not Lytton was actually one of Colburn's editors. (I have my own suspicions.) My webpage is at: http://www.bookscape.co.uk
Really?? I must research a contemporary critic's view... It is so long ago since I read Lytton... it took a long time to recover... I'm sure I remember him as being contemporaneously popular/ist but not perceived as any kind of literary genius. Maybe I'm projecting Oh well, (bet you're right about the editorship business though!) Ewan
For what it's worth a contemporary-ish view of Bulwer-Lytton can be found at http://www.victorianweb.org/authors/bulwer/mccarthy1.html Always provided it's not a spoof of course :-) Ewan
The Matrix games were pretty good too... ...or shite, depending on your opinion. ;-) pe ps oid Blogs! "the art of tea" "that's an odd courgette"

The All New Pepsoid the Second!

Topic locked