Homophobia

114 posts / 0 new
Last post
Ralph Dartford
Anonymous's picture
You are correct spider. As gods messenger Robbie Williams so rightly storms 'Let me entertain you.' Ralph
Mark Yelland-Brown
Anonymous's picture
Do you think `Robbie` is God's messenger? Well he is a cheeky chappie! (that's Robbie of course) If he was God's Messenger then God `is`really peed off with us! Anyway if you have no concrete beliefs in a particular deity, what about Cilla, or Des O'Connor as God's messengers, they are so ubiquitous! Chant by `vitrual` I mean that we've only met on the web!
mississippi
Anonymous's picture
You didn't offend me Sebastian, and if as you say, 'some people can't help being loud' then I suggest that they consider others before the noisy interlude starts and go someplace where they can't be heard. I have discussed this issue with several friends in the last day or so and they unanimously agree that they have no wish to listen to ANYONE of any sexual persuasion satisfying their lust.
Stuart the W an...
Anonymous's picture
RICKY MARTIN IS GAY?!!!!
1legspider
Anonymous's picture
errrr.. my take is that men of a certain age (between 13 and 90) are sexual predators and err less choosy about who they sleep with.. generally of course.. and recognising this trait in perhaps men who are gay.. What I am trying to say, of course, is if I think I were gay and found men attractive I would want to shag everything in sight.. but I am not, so there. I think the sexual habits of gay men are well documented.. (though I am no expert in this).. Can't think of the hetero equivalent of cruising, cottaging etc .. What about you girls, do you feel a titchy bit nervous in front of lesbians, sharing a loo?
Mykle
Anonymous's picture
'I can’t really see why God, or Christ, should care either way - except, that, for Christianity the whole purpose of having sex is to procreate!' If this condems any of us it condems most of us Sky Dolphin. Few people will be able to say that they have never has sex but to try to have children. However that was the official line until quite recently which is why there was so many bitter arguements about 'The Pill'. For the Roman Catholic 'coitus interuptus' was the only method allowed but even that was frowned upon. Just a little word in defence of my friends the cannibals - they only eat people who are already dead either because of great need or because it is part of their tradition - to get power from their ancestors by eating their brains etc. They do eat normally when they can. Kuru - an early form of CJD was directly caused by eating brains and so the poor cannibal has got a bad name. There are people who eat cats, dogs, horses and monkey brains who never suffer this intolerance. Jusy because a few extremists like human liver with Chianti it gives them all a bad name. Shame.
Liana
Anonymous's picture
nope
Liana
Anonymous's picture
my ex, who is as straight as they come *oo er missis etc* used to say that gay men were great - they are non judgmental, and because they (in the main) have brilliant senses of humour (as a result probably, of having to defend themselves through adolescence and so developing said strong humour) he also said that when a gay man chatted him up it was great - to be fancied by anyone boosts the ego, whether gay or straight.
Mykle
Anonymous's picture
In respect to an earlier point. I think Christianity felt threatened by homosexuality. I think that it felt threatened by homosexuality for the same reason it discouraged birth control; it limits the number of babies - potential Christians. Both the Greeks and the Romans were having a similar problem, around the same time, and indeed one of the Roman leaders had to make a proclamation to the aristocracy to take more wives. He probably couldn’t sleep for all the noise :-) It seems to me that a fair proportion of the Christian clergy have been secretly gay - unless it’s just more propaganda. I can’t really see why God, or Christ, should care either way - except, that, for Christianity the whole purpose of having sex is to procreate!
Ralph
Anonymous's picture
Hello My name is Steve and I work with Ralph in his office. He is skiving as usual but has just shown me what you lot are rabbiting about. As a gay man I am embarrassed by what you are writing. I am not representative of all gay society but do have my dick pointed firmly at the national Gay-Dar and most of you are well off the map. What I am reading here is just middle class liberal rubbish. Mr Sippi is the only one who is talking sense. Liana and Fish, congratulations on having token gay pals, do you wheel them out at dinner parties and serve them with Kylie and quiche? You are so way off the mark as to almost warrant a witch-hunt. Blooming inverted homophobic Fag Hags. Oh sorry! Is that a sweeping generalisation? Sex is a very private thing. Steve
Liana
Anonymous's picture
token gay pals? dave would be offended to be considered a token. or are you attempting to categorize yourself as the stereotypical bitchy gay queen? cos if you are, you aint good enough. sweety :o)
fish
Anonymous's picture
well steve ... i don't consider my friends of whatever sex sexuality or race or anything else to be token in any way ... what you are saying is fair enough ... but no need to be insulting of other people who are just having their say ... i speak it how i see it ... perhaps you have been working with ralph too long ... his nasty habits seem to have worn off on you ...
Stuart
Anonymous's picture
Look. Wait a second. Are you trying to tell me that Ricky Martin is gay?

Pages

Topic locked