What makes a great title?
I believe many great books are buried under obscure or mediocre titles and not a few crappy books have become international best sellers because their titles radiantly promise infinitely more than they actually deliver. Rightly or wrongly, we apparently like or dislike someone we meet in the first five seconds of seeing their face and I suspect the same sort of thing often applies to book titles/covers. I don’t know what makes a great title and if you have a theory I’d be delighted to hear it.
There are thousands of remarkable titles but a few favourites that come to my mind are: Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil, Heart of Darkness, For Whom the Bell Tolls, Lord of the Flies, Confessions of a Justified Sinner, Tale of Two Cities, The Kite Runner, Catcher in the Rye, Hitch Hikers Guide to the Galaxy. They’re all great stories in different ways.
Extraordinary books which I feel undeservedly never made it as best sellers because their titles were too obscure or too boring include The Clamour King, Foe, and Disgrace. The last two were written by J M Coetzee, winner of two Booker Prizes and the Nobel Prize for Literature. I doubt whether all his books combined have sold even one hundredth of one per cent of blockbusters such as The Da Vinci Code and Twilight. I think I may be the only one who’s ever read The Clamour King. The title gives nothing away, least of all that it is set in a British boarding school and concerns the strange trials and tribulations of a young boy cursed with great beauty.
It’s commonly accepted that particular books catch on through word of mouth (in the broadest virtual world sense) but if the words coming out of people’s mouths when they mention a book sound dull or are difficult to remember the message dies there, no matter how much a friend or acquaintance may enthuse about a particular story or how accomplished it may be in any objective sense. Any thoughts, anyone?
renderedtruth
Helvigo Jenkins