'I reckon the odds are 50/50 I might have something to say.'

There's a breath of fresh air in the Jennifer Jane stories. Mind you I might be biased!

To be fair to these naughty writers Pia, there is an "erotica" classification for posts - the only stuff i've read on here (accidently of course several times) is Suedinum's which although at times makes me want to projectile, there can be little argument that the writing is good.

We decided right at the start that we would allow an outlet for this kind of writing - so long as it was properly labelled and people would be able to avoid it if they wished. Whilst it holds little attraction for me personally I think it's as necessary for people with these notions to get them down on paper as it is for people with other buckets of personal goo to get them down. I make no apology for allowing 'erotica' - it can be steered well clear of.

I like your argument Tony- it may quite be necessary for some- though not me. And I believe if it can help someone to leviate their burden then better do it on paper and screen than go out and do a mess somewhere so I comply. Well glad I got some feedback. Thanks- Geoffrey- I can't see why on earth you should be biased- ha ha I thought Jennifer Jane had a mind of her own.. Oh yes.. well I suppose so then .... If it has to be then ... let it ;)Pia

new Cavalcaderl julie I entirely agree Editor T.cook. Site has list for right category. As it goes under the right one. Up to who reads it,dont have to carry on. I didn't like, poems on body and dieing,cos when experienced most things and helped,makes one feel sick inside. Only my opinion for me,no offence to the writer, whoever. Other's like. But got no feed back! Cos naturally other's liked. I go by title,so wrong contents,that's me. Erotica is just writer's way of bringing in there fantasies,and ideas. But some so near the mark,in erotica. Doesn't interest me at all. But one can go and buy books what! they want that is different. I remember F word was used most in poems,and stories get their point,across! that's not for me. Calmer site now. But anything seems to go,papers books webs now. Who am I to judge! I'm not prim and proper just,in a different generation. Most things are allowed on here! Then we don't have to read,if it's not to our taste, do we? I suppose like pepper and ginger,hot things,up to individual. I feel swearing demoralises the site, but be weak maybe then to some? I have sat by dieing, and heard last breath so knocks one out bit,if put into poems. I think,sensitive people act differently think. Sir David Jason states swear words not needed t.v. as has young children. Go on have a blast at me! Yes, I swear at home,tension to go. From mine! Now most books,have a swear in. Everyone likes different things. But when or if anyone has been through, so many awful things,course will be more against some things natural,I know so. Maybe break for a while. Better adjust writing again properly,slowly and correctly. Phew! cavalcaderl julie x

Highhat I'm not only biased but battered and bruised! JJ is a very hard task master and if I don't get it down correctly there's trouble!.

So, no one up for writing an entry for the bad sex awards then? http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/dec/06/david-guterson-bad-sex-award