If Derrida If not the Derrida!

If Derrida If not the Derrida!

If Logos is the the cube and Lexis is the Volume!

Critique of Deconstruction

The Derridian Language of deconstruction annihilates the dialectic of
the Sign to be absence or presence, or both of it to an act of violent
genocide as nullification. In the process of deconstruction
(destruction), Derrida manipulated the very nature of the sign within
the functionality of play as bound to discourse and philosophy and
existing as the appropiative content of signifcation. Play of
signifcation became (Malappropiative) as being monocratic,
orthodoxical, inserting the non-violence of the vellum to a
coup-de-etat of -The Appropriate, Only Appropriate and approximations
of conceiving the entire school of thought as The appropriate
University with an universal thought. The developmental methodology of
Derridian thought was an artifice as the medium of expression as a core
content of the very tool of deconstruction was already existing in an
irrevocable medium, the nature of the sign to exist in the language of
discourse by way of appropiations.

If Xanthippe Mid-Wifed the Dialectic, Deconstruction adopted surgical
insertions to places of intent within the structure of what was
preexisting existing as Appropriation.