Diplomatic letter to the B.B.C.
By seannelson
- 349 reads
I admire your news organization, and since my youth it's been probably
my honest top news source. Though I've always been a proud American, I
found that regarding American stories your coverage was largely absent
the maddening spin and censorship(of course most of the truly shocking
and interesting stories were pulled within an hour or two to the best of
my recollection.) Now while we're dealing with British affairs, let me
clarify that I personally respect your Royal family; I don't covet
their throne and aside from defending the reality that I descend
directly from Henry Howard, earl of Surrey and have some minor dash of
British royal blood... I know something of the history of the Catholic
House of Howard(like the possibility that Shakespeare acquired his
college education tutoring our boys and girls...) it was always a deep
part of family and social life, and so I'm aware and somewhat
knowledgeable... particularly due to my passion for poetry and my
laureled university education. Succinctly, I do not personally aspire
to be monarch nor did I ever seek a dictatorial rule on these shores...
nor did I even seek the level of political power that I did indeed
reluctantly wield for some time.
Now, regarding criminal questions... the philosophical inquiry would
revolve around the term: 'paedophile' though that term doesn't
accurately describe me, when the matter is questioned openly for this
reason. A paedophile is a person who engages in sexual activity with
teenage girls or psychologically speaking has a tendency to obsess over,
prefer.. nearly consummate. The truth is that many male psyches and
biologies(people are different) just aren't very well satisfied by
digital sexuality... thus in the frustrations of masturbation end up
reading shocking things... but not even viewing in terms of the
paedophile question because knowing that since the Ginsberg "Howl"
ruling, it's legal to read about Lolita sexuality(which I do no more
than about other sexuality) but not to view underage persons in sexual
situations... so I never have. there are whole corporations that show
only images of legally certified 18+ girls in soft porn 'art...' which
occasionally it is. I've followed these laws.
There's another British media organization that's been inherent in my
life: abctales.com , through which I've been associated with some
gathering of your literati and upper crust. Of all the awarded pieces I
wrote over the years, they did the most to promote my awarded poem: "An
American Thinks of Russia," a piece of verse that came about because my
stepmother the librarian had studied Russian and taught me a little of
the language and literary culture... as a lover of poetry, I naturally
found Pushkin and Tchaikovsky fascinating and spiritually significant.
They came up with a unique Uncle Sam logo for this poem.
Now early on in my ascension to influence, the Democratic Senatorial
committee, albeit in the e-mail format, sent me a long and eloquent
letter, specific in its request, and asked that I assist the Democratic
aisle of the Senate in its official duties, with every official
assurance. The image and social imprint of Sen. Elizabeth Warren was
upon this perfectly honorable letter. Importantly, it made no request
of secrecy, or I would have bargained. Secrecy is a door to corruption
and although I understand its economic and social uses, I've always
believed that it can do more damage than leadership or individual
participants realize. My personal ethics are better than you might
think. When I was a treasured blonde professor in Thailand, I had many
young female and male charges. I never slept with one of them because
that would have crossed the legal and moral line... though I may have
been encouraged to do so by other professors. I did not.
Now, regarding my statements as a public political figure: let's be
real: harsh speech is fairly native to the journalistic discourse of
both Britain and the U.S.A.. A moral and honorable line lies in that
you do not assassinate or advocate assassination... and very
consistently and clearly, in the face of entrapment, I have not. On the
contrary, I have emphasized the importance of pacifism. This is
because I remember another contested Democratic convention wherein
liberalism was perceived over-strong. The youth trained for Karate
before this Convention and ended up quite bloodied. I foresaw this from
the start and for this reason emphasized pacifism. I am, in simple
truth, one of humanity's best and brightest minds... and thus in this
day and age, I should be able to discuss a subject like welfare reform,
and the intellectual reality of slashing welfare funds in a
low-safeguard society and economy is that children aren't fed and grow
sick.... the government action of slashing welfare leads to the
unnatural death of children. That's what the money was for, and when
you cut those funds... you create that reality. You can't put that
whole blame on the person who for idealistic reasons puts it in
language. Corruption and political sand-bagging aside, the rights I'm
asking for are normally accorded.
Moving on, receiving no money for these activities but having been officially asked(in a letter my dad saw and assented to,) I did labor long
and hard for the U.S. Senate, our national interests as I perceived
them, and for the campaign of Sen. Bernie Sanders. I frequently praised
and didn't betray the President. Because I had a significant role in
governing, I had numerous conversations(mostly online) with high and
medium level officials. I grew up in semi-aristocratic families, and my
mom had been a U.S. agent in Germany during the Cold War. If you
combine this with a passion for knowledge and a tendency to read the
European newspapers... the elite can't censor reality even from the
elite. But I've had almost no communication with government officials
from foreign powers- literally almost none- and these conversations
weren't serious or substantive. I never spoke with any Russian agent
save if it casually in my university years or something; I don't recall
any such encounter. There was a married woman named Oksana from the
Ukraine I knew online; she translated some of my poems. She offered to
come to me, but because she was married, I declined and I never met her
personally. This is the truth regarding all these matters; I solemnly
swear it.
Diplomatically yours,
Sean Lawlor Nelson
- Log in to post comments