My Scientific Controversies
By seannelson
- 76 reads
Throughout my life and career, I have been associated with a number of scientific positions. One was that Darwin's theories though not incorrect were far from complete, and the theories of Jean Baptiste Lamarck were also correct and important. Another was that Niels Bohr's theory of quantum entanglement was and is correct, and that this force of the universe can be used to develop communication and other technologies such as quantum computers. Another is that Jupiter's moon of Europa has an enormous liquid ocean, and that there is probably oceanic life such as algae, fish, and cephalods can be found there. I have argued that human colonization of space is important; and that Europa is the place, not Mars. For decades of prolific writing and conversation, these positions have been my truth; and over these decades, mainstream scientific leaders have raked me over the coals; and fought these advancing theories tooth and nail, study by discreditment. I am the one who found quantum entanglement in the discarded history books, did the math, and said: 'This is correct.' My work and I are the reasons that quantum entanglement and Lamarckian evolution are being seriously studied; Yet I feel that I am not being given proper credit, which wrongs my children and friends. They want the scientific work and ideas; but they pay no attention to proper credit.
- Log in to post comments


