Upbringing
By TJW
- 677 reads
Phone rings.
Number recognized.
"Sir."
"Hello, son."
"Hello, sir. How are you?"
"I'm donig just fine. I, uh, I just wanted to let you know that I'm proud of you for trying again."
---------
". . . thank you, sir."
"Yes, and I . . . I want you to know that it wasn't me. It was your mama and your sissy. I was proud of you, I am proud of you."
"I know, sir, thank you, sir."
"So . . . what are your planning for today?"
"Football, house chores, nothing special."
"That's right, that's right. Take it easy."
"Yes, sir."
"Well . . . Roll Tide."
"Yes, sir, Roll Tide."
" . . . don't be too hard on yourself, son. You've done your damndest."
--------------
"Yeah, yes, yes, sir."
"We'll talk again."
"Yes, sir."
"Goodbye, son."
"Goodbye, sir."
- Log in to post comments
Comments
It's all between the lines
It's all between the lines TJW. Welcome back!
- Log in to post comments
Some people prefer to keep to
Some people prefer to keep to their usernames on ABCtales - no formality intended. How long does it take him? Please don't go into too much detail because I haven't eaten yet : )
- Log in to post comments
Your Python must be happy to
Your Python must be happy to live so long! My goldfish lived 30 something, and his (?) scales went white. Is there any sign how old your Python is? Do they get arthritis?
Telephone conversations seem a really good idea for a radio play, no distraction from emotion in the voices
- Log in to post comments
Locke
There is a film called Locke, starring Tom Hardy, in which he is the only character. He is in his car on his mobile, desperately making calls while his personal and professional lives unravel around him. Might sound boring but it's absolutely riveting, inviting the viewers (or listeners rather) to use their own imaginations.
- Log in to post comments
Loved this.
So clever, so inventive. Less is more. It's the writer's job to fire up the readers' imaginations, and you've certainly done that by presenting a framework for your readers to imagine their own back story. I certainly did.
- Log in to post comments
Hi Jack. I'm basing it on an
Hi Jack. I'm basing it on an American military family, a Marine family on both sides. The boy has grown up assuming he will go into the Marines. The first time he tries he fails Boot Camp. His mother and his sister, who have done nothing much with their own lives and bask in the reflected glory and status of being in a Marines family, make no secret of the fact they consider him a failure, and put pressure on him to try again.
The second time he tries, he gets all the way through the first 3 phases and then fails in The Crucible.
He has come home, physically shattered and emotionally demoralised, the day before the phone call.
His mother has already rung him and told him she's embarrassed and ashamed.
The phone rings again and he thinks it's his sister to say the same. He nearly doesn't answer, but it's his father, an ex-Marine, who tells him he loves him (not in so many words, because they're both men) and he's proud of him for trying again and doing his best.
- Log in to post comments
That's just because of
That's just because of intradepartmental rivalry in the War Department – when I recently read Samuel Hynes WWII memoir 'Flights of Passage' I was shocked at just how bad that rivalry was.
I don't have the book here (I lent it to my 97 year old father who did his national service in the RAF at the end of the war) but I can remember Hynes saying that all the armed services disliked each other, and within each service there were subsets. The enlisted men disliked the officers. The USMC infantry disliked the USMC pilots. The USMC bomber pilots disliked the USMC fighter pilots. And all vice versa. I couldn't understand how that could be, when they were all on the same side.
Is it still like that now ?
- Log in to post comments


